Monday, October 18, 2010

10-18-10


by permission from Stephen P. Wenger
comments in () by the same
http://www.spw-duf.info



NSSF vs. MAIG: In a recent report by the Mayors Against Illegal Guns (MAIG) coalition, an anti-gun organization led by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the group misuses firearms tracing data in order to push its own gun-control agenda… The MAIG report also alleges that states with strong regulations and oversight of firearm sales have less firearms trafficking than states that lack such measures. Though countless examples to refute this claim exist, let's focus on three: California, Virginia and South Carolina.
  • The Golden State, with some of the strictest gun laws in the country, is the source state for 73 percent of its own recovered firearms. This means that nearly three-quarters of the firearms recovered in California were originally bought in the state. Neighboring Arizona, where the state legislature respects the Second Amendment and trusts its law-abiding citizens to exercise their right to keep and bear arms, has a paltry seven percent of the guns recovered in California. What's more, that seven percent makes the Grand Canyon State the second highest source of recovered firearms for California!
  • The Commonwealth of Virginia, though it restricts law-abiding citizens to only one-gun-a-month, is considered to be a top source state by the MAIG – a seeming disconnect with the organization's claim that tough gun laws limit trafficking.
  • In South Carolina, one-gun-a-month was repealed (allowing for more guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens) and, like the rest of the U.S., South Carolinians experienced a decrease in violent crime. For the purposes of the MAIG study, South Carolina, without one-gun-a-month, didn't even crack the top 10 on the MAIG list of source states…
http://www.ammoland.com/2010/10/18/mayors-against-illegal-guns-twists-the-truth-about-firearms-trace-data/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ammoland+%28AmmoLand.com%29
---

Federal Judges Not Birds of a Feather: A Federal Magistrate Judge in Massachusetts just outdid the Brady Center in their ludicrous interpretation of the United States Supreme Court Heller decision which declared that we have an individual, fundamental enumerated Constitutional right to carry a weapon for the purpose of self defense. On October 14th, Judge Marrianne B. Bowler of Massachusetts ruled that the Second Amendment does not preclude laws or actions which are not "...tantamount to an absolute restriction on plaintiff's right to possess firearms in his home." …Unlike Judge Bowler in Massachusetts, Judge Gonzalez quoted directly from the Heller decision. Nowhere in the Heller decision does the High Court state that the right to keep and bear (or carry) arms is limited to the home. Instead, the High Court gave the home as an example as to where the right applied. The exact words the Court used was "such as" which, as any first grader knows, means for example and does not mean "only." The High Court also gave two examples of where the right could be restricted in public; Schools and Government buildings. Places the Court described as "sensitive." If the Court had intended to restrict their decision "only to the home" they would have said so and would have had no need to devote as much of the opinion to a discussion of carrying firearms in public as they did…

http://www.examiner.com/la-in-los-angeles/massachusetts-and-california-federal-judges-on-the-2nd-amendment
---

But That's a Gun-Free Zone!:
Two postal workers were killed Monday in a shooting at a post office in west Tennessee during a possible robbery attempt, authorities said. The Lauderdale County Sheriff's Department told the Associated Press that two female employees were killed Monday morning in what may have been a robbery at the Henning post office. Officers are searching for a maroon Chevrolet Malibu with two men inside. A witness told a state employee at the Tennessee Capitol in Nashville, Tony Burns, that the shooting happened during a robbery attempt. Mr. Burns said his sister-in-law, a U.S. Postal Service worker, was assigned to the Henning office Monday. He said she told him she escaped unharmed… (Even if we are able to repeal the ban on firearms in non-secure federal facilities, it's unlikely that postal employees would be allowed to carry. Nonetheless, the tragic death of these two women points out the folly of creating gun-free zones as criminals are more likely to be encouraged than dissuaded by such postings.)

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/oct/18/2-workers-killed-tenn-post-office-shooting/
---

Florida – Five Years of Stand-Your-Ground Law:
…If history serves, the gunman stands a very good chance in court. The case may not even make it to trial. That's because of Florida Statute 776.013(3), which took effect five years ago this month. The old law gave you the right to protect yourself with deadly force inside your home. The 2005 law gives you the right to protect yourself in a park, outside a Chili's, on a highway – just about anywhere. You need only to "reasonably believe" that pulling the trigger or plunging the knife or swinging the bat is necessary to stop the other person from hurting you. Reports of justifiable homicides tripled after the law went into effect, according to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. Last year, twice a week, on average, someone's killing was considered warranted. The self-defense law – known as "stand your ground" – has been invoked in at least 93 cases with 65 deaths, a St. Petersburg Times review found. In the majority of the cases, the person's use of force was excused by prosecutors and the courts. Proponents say that means the law is working, allowing people to protect themselves without having to ponder legalities in the heat of an attack. You don't have to wait to see how much of a victim you're going to be. You don't have to wait for the first bone to break. But the law has also been used to excuse violence in deadly neighbor arguments, bar brawls, road rage – even a gang shoot-out – that just as easily might have ended with someone walking away… (There appears to be a movement among Florida's journalists to prevent criminal stupidity from becoming terminal stupidity. Ever since I have been back in Arizona, stand-your-ground has been the law, whether by case law or statute, and I don't recall this many incidents being attributed to it. Admittedly, Florida's population is about 2.8 times greater than Arizona's but the five-year-old change in Florida's law was and continues to be highly publicized. Many people are familiar with the first portion or Heinlein's quotation about an armed society being a polite society but are unfamiliar with the entire paragraph, which includes, "But gunfighting has a strong biological use. We do not have enough things that kill off the weak and the stupid these days.")

http://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/crime/article1128317.ece
---

Meanwhile, in Illinois…: A jury found a University Park man guilty Friday of killing a neighbor whose dog had urinated on his prized lawn. The panel convicted Charles J. Clements, 69, of 530 Landau Road, of second-degree murder for the death of Joshua Funches, 23. But the jury rejected a more serious charge of first-degree murder against Clements, signaling they concluded that at the time he shot Funches, Clements thought he was acting in self-defense but that his belief was unreasonable. Authorities said Funches was walking his fox terrier on Landau Road on May 9 when the dog urinated on Clements' lawn. Neighbors said Clements, a retired truck driver and former Marine, was a fanatic about his lawn, chasing errant children from the grass he worked on every day and winning beautification awards for his efforts. Clements then confronted Funches about the dog's deposit and then followed him down the street. Clements said in court filings that Funches threatened him, swore at Clements' wife and then hit Clements in the face. He said he was in fear for his life when he pulled a .45-caliber handgun from his pocket and fired a single gunshot at Funches, striking him in the abdomen and killing him… (Note the disparity in ages between the 23-year-old puncher and the 69-year-old shooter. Personally, regardless of how much I prized my lawn, I wouldn't have pursued the dog owner.)

http://www.southtownstar.com/news/2806104,101710lawnshooting.article
---

No Lack of Fertilizer in the White Mountains:
…Women are becoming gun owners and learning to shoot in larger numbers than ever before. The old methods of protecting yourself, such as blowing a whistle, learning martial arts, and using things like pepper spray and mace, aren't enough to help women feel safe anymore. Crime touches every part of the country, even in rural areas. Local radio personality Barbara Bruce knows first-hand what it feels like to be unprotected. "I have a stalker and sleep with a butcher knife and bells on my doors," Barbara said. "I don't want to be a victim." Bruce took a gun safety class offered by local resident Linda Gilbertson, a NRA certified firearms instructor, and she wasn't the only one. "I held 13 classes this summer for women only and have a waiting list," said Gilbertson. During the class that Bruce attended in September, there were four women in attendance. "I try to limit the classes to four so I can have more one-on-one time with them," states Gilbertson… (I'm all for women being trained to use firearms safely and effectively but can't help wonder about local radio personality Barbara Bruce being taught to grasp a pistol with all four fingers or each hand. I gave Barbara my business card five years ago, shortly after the first edition of my book was published but have never heard from her.)

http://www.wmicentral.com/news/latest_news/article_0b9bd34c-d7df-11df-9744-001cc4c03286.html
---

Oops, Wrong Eatery: Johnston County [NC] deputies said an attempted robbery at a local restaurant on Friday evening turned into a shootout, leaving one suspect dead. The robbery happened shortly before 6 p.m. at Shoeheel Grill, Grocery and Gas at 8212 Old Beulah Road in Kenly, Johnston County Sheriff Steve Bizzell said. The owner, his son and two female employees were the only people in the store when a man walked in and displayed a weapon, Bizzell said. The man pointed the gun at the owner's son. The owner came from a back room with a weapon. The two exchanged gunfire in the store. The suspect was shot but made it outside to his van, Bizzell said. The owner also went outside and noticed a second suspect in the parking lot, Bizzell said. At this point, the owner had gotten a second weapon. The second suspect began firing a rifle at the owner, who returned fire. The second suspect fled on foot into some nearby woods, Bizzell said. The first suspect was found dead in his van…

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/8462902/
---

Oops, Wrong Musician: In a bizarre shooting in front of an upscale restaurant in downtown Sacramento [CA] on Saturday night, police said a member of a jazz band pulled a pistol and shot one of two men who had picked fights with a waiter, a homeless man and the band member. The band member, whom police did not identify, was detained but not arrested… The events began shortly before 7 p.m. when two men described as large white men in their 20s, possibly intoxicated, tried to pick a fight with a valet parking attendant and mooned patrons at Ella restaurant at 12th and K streets, witnesses told The Bee. The men crossed the street to the Broiler restaurant, where they entered the building and again started trouble, police and witnesses said. As they exited the building, the men touched one of several human-sized cat figurines belonging to a jazz band that was playing on the patio just outside the restaurant. A band member told the men to stop it. At that point, a homeless man in his early 20s confronted the two men and they beat him, said Sgt. Norm Leong, police spokesman. They punched a waiter who tried to intervene, knocking him to the ground, and then the two men punched the band member and backed off,Leong said. But the two men again approached the band member, at which point he pulled a pistol and shot one of the assailants, Leong said. Leong said the man suspected of firing the gun was not arrested. He said police will refer the case to the District Attorney's Office to determine if he shot in self-defense and whether charges are merited against anybody in the case… (My suspicion is that the musician may end up being charged with unlicensed CCW, unless he holds a CWP issued in another county.)

http://www.sacbee.com/2010/10/17/3110857/sacramento-cops-say-musician-shot.html
---

Rule Two, Rule Three Reminder: Police in New Hampshire say a 23-year-old Manchester man had to be hospitalized after accidentally shooting himself in the leg with a friend's gun shortly after attending a gun show. Manchester police Lt. James Soucy said Michael Hunter and 23-year-old Andrew Shelley each bought two guns at a show in Manchester on Saturday. Police said the men drove to Shelley's apartment and that Hunter shot himself with Shelley's .40-caliber handgun outside of the car while trying to locate the gun's safety. Officials said he was listed in fair condition after being taken to a hospital. (Rule Two: don't let the muzzle cross anything you're not prepared to shoot. Rule Three: Keep your finger out of the trigger guard until your sights are on the target and you're prepared to fire.)

http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2010/10/17/nh_man_shoots_self_in_leg_after_buying_gun_at_show/
---

Rule Four Reminder: A 76-year-old woman was shot in the head on Sunday by a man target practicing with a rifle in Hiram [ME], police said. Investigators said Yvonne Dorrity was outside doing some yard work at about 11 a.m. with her son, 47-year-old Mark Hendricks, when they heard a very loud gun shot from the sand pit across the street. Dorrity told police that she immediately felt the bullet hit her in the head just above her right eye…Police arrested 20-year-old Sean McNulty, of Parsonsfield, who they said was target-shooting a rifle in the sand pit at the corner of S. Hiram and New Settlement roads in Hiram. Investigators said that McNulty had set up gallon milk jugs filled with water on the bank of the sand pit. Police said a bullet ricocheted off of one of the jugs and continued another 350 feet before it struck Dorrity in the head… Dorrity was treated at her residence by Sacopee Rescue personnel for injuries that were not life-threatening, police said. McNulty was charged with reckless conduct. (Rule Four is generally expressed as being sure of your target and what's beyond it but ricochets are usually difficult to predict. This once was more likely off a rock or packed dirt, not the relatively soft milk jug. I cannot count the number of times I have been hit or seen others hit by ricochets. Unless they involve very heavy bullets, they are usually of low energy but I have seen several penetrations of skin by shards of jacket material from JHP bullets. If you do not wear wraparound eyeglasses or side shields at shooting ranges, make it a point not to turn your head sideways toward the direction from which ricochets can occur. I have seen one case where the fragment of a lead bullet came within ¼" of the eye of someone who ignored such advice.)

http://www.wmtw.com/news/25421381/detail.html
---

Rule Five Reminder: For years, customs agent Jose Melendez-Perez was hailed as an American hero of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Now, after making what he says was his first major mistake in 44 years of public service, Melendez-Perez is fighting to get his old job back. He faces a disciplinary hearing this week in Florida. Melendez-Perez, 64, an immigration officer at Orlando International Airport, stopped the supposed "20th hijacker" from entering the United States in August 2001. He won national acclaim for grilling passenger Mohammed Qahtani for 90 minutes and then denying him entry. But six months ago, Melendez-Perez drove a U.S. Customs and Border Protection van home for the weekend, violating agency policy. He locked his service weapon, an agency computer and other items inside. Someone broke into the van and stole the items, which were never recovered… (Rule Five: Maintain control of your firearm.)

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2010/10/18/20101018customsagent1018.html
---

Note the Injuries: A police officer was shot twice in the leg on Sunday night after an exchange of gunfire in a building in East New York, Brooklyn, the police said. The officer and a suspect, who was also shot three times, were in stable condition. The officer, Richard Ramirez, 29, was among three plainclothes officers who observed a man riding his bicycle on the sidewalk, and when the man saw the police, he ran into a building at 454 Bradford Street, authorities said. The officers, who were part of an anticrime unit, chased the man, who sources said was 17 and from Brooklyn. When the man was unable to enter an apartment on the third floor, he turned and fired on the officers; a German-made gun with six expended rounds was found at the scene, said the police commissioner, Raymond W. Kelly. Mr. Kelly made his comments at a news conference at Kings County Hospital Center, where Officer Ramirez was taken with injuries that were not life-threatening, according to a hospital spokesman. He was undergoing surgery late Sunday evening to remove a bullet from his calf. The alleged shooter, whose name was not released, was taken to Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center and was also undergoing surgery… (A few years ago, while reviewing NYPD summaries of officer-involved shootings, John Farnam observed that when officers are shot by criminals they are most often struck in the lower abdomen or legs and are rarely struck at distances beyond six meters. This is consistent with inexperienced shooters pushing or jerking shots low and to the non-dominant side. For this reason, many instructors counsel not to use kneeling or prone positions without cover as doing so may only serve to place your most vital organs in the line of fire.)

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/18/nyregion/18cop.html?ref=nyregion
---

2009 LEO's Killed in the Line-of-Duty: An assistant police chief with 27 years of law enforcement experience was shot and killed on an Arkansas highway after stopping a suspected stolen vehicle. A 30-year-old U.S. Border Patrol agent was shot multiple times while on patrol near San Diego. A patrol officer in Pennsylvania awaiting backup was ambushed in his police cruiser after responding to a 9-1-1 call. These three officers, who paid the ultimate price for their desire to serve and protect the public, are just three of the 48 law enforcement officers from around the nation who lost their lives in the line of duty during 2009. You can read more about the sacrifices made by these brave men and women in the just-released Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted, 2009, an annual reminder of the dangers of policing… (The linked article summarizes the circumstances of these deaths, along with non-lethal assaults and accidental deaths. Several of the incidents were captured by dash-mounted cameras and I'm sure that many list members have viewed at least some of these incidents. They often showed tipping points, where resistance emerges. While officers may not always be able to disengage at that point, the private citizen would generally be well served by disengaging when signs of resistance emerge.)

http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2010/october/law-enforcement-officers-killed-and-assaulted-1/leoka_101909
---



Wednesday, October 6, 2010

10-06-10


By permission From: Stephen P. Wenger
http://www.spw-duf.info

comments in () by the same

---

NRA's Democrat Endorsements: The National Rifle Association has endorsed incumbent  Democrats in several crucial congressional races this year, frustrating Republicans who believe the group is hurting its cause - and the party's chances in November. Although the NRA's agenda usually aligns with that of the GOP, the powerful group also adheres to what it calls "an incumbent-friendly" policy: If an incumbent and a challenger candidate have equally strong records protecting gun rights, the incumbent gets the endorsement, regardless of party. The result: Of the 20 most endangered incumbent House Democrats in the country - based on race ratings by The Washington Post's "The Fix" - 14 have received the endorsement of the NRA's Political Victory Fund. The NRA's bipartisan strategy has existed for several years. But the stakes appear higher this cycle, as control of the House is in play and Democrats' red-state gains in 2006 and 2008 mean the party has a huge number of incumbents running for reelection in conservative-leaning districts…

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/06/AR2010100603363.html?hpid=moreheadlines

Ever since the middle of Bill Clinton's second term, the highest-profile issue that the American left has been unable to push in any major way has been gun regulations. That's remarkable considering that during this time, Democrats have held the presidency for about four years and Democrats have had the presidency and the Congress for two. Credit for some of this has to go to the National Rifle Association which has built up a powerful lobbying force and also been more than happy to endorse candidates who are Democrats but in favor of gun rights. That position has rankled some conservatives over the years but especially so this year with Republicans hoping to retake the House and depose such liberal stalwarts as Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nevada). The NRA's bipartisan stance is potentially harming those hopes as it's endorsed 39 Democratic candidates in the House as blogger Daniel Horowitz notes: " Believe it or not, the only ones who might help Nancy Pelosi save her House majority are those who run legislative affairs at the NRA.  So called Blue Dog Democrats across the nation are campaigning as red meat conservatives in their home districts, while running deceptive ads about their Republican opponents.  They campaign as if they have nothing to do with the Democrat Party that they propelled to power and which passed all of the nefarious legislation that they purport to oppose.  The sick irony is that the more successful these liars are in distancing themselves from Pelosi, the more likely it will be that Pelosi will remain Speaker.  Here is my previous report on the need to expose the blue dogs.  Also, check out the Club for Growth's excellent report on the lie of the conservative Democrat." …

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/nra-may-stop-gop-from-taking-the-house-104370898.html
---

Brady Bunch Opposes Licensed CCW: The Legal Action Project of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence filed an amicus brief today in federal court in California in defense of San Diego County's concealed handgun permitting process in Peruta v. County of San Diego. The California Pistol & Rifle Association and five individuals sued San Diego County and its sheriff, claiming a constitutional right to carry loaded guns in public places, and challenging California's "may issue" permitting process, under which law enforcement officers determine who has "good cause" to receive a permit allowing them to carry a concealed handgun in public places. The Brady Center argues that the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decisions in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago held only that there is a Second Amendment right to possess guns in the home for self-defense, and do not require San Diego County to change its permitting process…

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/brady-center-fed-court-must-uphold-calif-gun-law
---

Pennsylvania House Passes Stand-Your-Ground Bill: The state House passed a measure expanding gun-owners' rights while scuttling for the second time in as many days an effort by gun-control advocates to close the so-called Florida loophole. In a bipartisan 159-38 vote, the House approved expansion of the so-called castle doctrine, which allows individuals to defend themselves beyond their home - or castle - or vehicle. At the same time, House Republicans, backed by dozens of Democratic supporters, shut down attempts to consider any amendments proposed by gun-control advocates. One that had the wide support of law enforcement and mayors across Pennsylvania would have closed a loophole that allows individuals denied gun permits in Pennsylvania to get them elsewhere. Castle-doctrine critics, some of whom called it the "shoot first, ask questions later" bill, fumed over a procedural vote that stifled any debate on the issue or the amendments… (In his book On Homicide, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, "Detached reflection is not demanded in the presence of an upraised knife.")

http://www.philly.com/inquirer/local/pa/20101006_State_House_passes_bill_expanding_gun-owners__rights.html
---

Open Carry and Refusal to ID: A Spanaway [WA] man says his rights were violated when authorities asked for his ID after he walked into a Starbucks location wearing a gun. "Basically I go to Starbucks everyday for lunch, and get a coffee, usually sit there and eat my lunch," said Tom Brewster. "This time when I pulled up to the Starbucks I saw the sheriff's vehicle in the parking lot. I walked in, got in line, and as soon as I got in line the Sheriff approached me and asked me, 'Is that a gun? I'm going to need to see your ID.'" Brewster says the incident didn't end with his initial refusal to hand over his ID. "He just kept insisting that I show him my ID and I said, 'Look, am I being detained?' he said, 'No,' and I said, 'Ok, well, then this conversation is over.' While I proceeded to order my drink he went out to his car and radioed for some other sheriff's and by the time I got my drink they were already in the parking lot." "The issue here really isn't even with the gun. It's with the fourth amendment and my rights," says Brewster. "Basically I was standing up for my right for the unreasonable search and seizure of my papers." The fourth amendment is meant to protect citizens from unreasonable search and seizure… (My opinion: If the deputy responded to a call, he needs ID to close out his paperwork. If he acted on his own initiative, it would be more judicious to furnish ID and file a complaint. If a department shows a pattern of this sort of harassment, I would seek injunctive relief.)

http://www.mynorthwest.com/category/local_news_articles/20101005/Man-asked-for-ID-while-carrying-gun-says-his-rights-were-violated/
---

Iowa Sheriff Completes Court-Ordered Course on Constitution: He didn't get an A+, but a Northwest Iowa sheriff reportedly made the grade recently in a court-ordered course on the U.S. Constitution. Osceola County Sheriff Douglas Weber enrolled in the course at the order of U.S. District Court Judge Mark Bennett, who ruled the sheriff must take the course for violating the rights of Ocheyedan resident Paul Dorr in wrongfully denying him a permit to carry a concealed weapon. According to court documents filed Tuesday, Weber completed a 300-level course through the University of Phoenix. He earned a B-. Dorr, 54, said a B- was pretty much what he thought Weber would get. Dorr and his son, Alexander, then 18, filed a federal lawsuit against Weber after they were denied applications to carry a concealed weapon… Dorr maintained he needed the weapon permit for safety, due to his work for taxpayer groups, and the denial violated his civil rights… (I find it quite sad that an adult who is the chief law enforcement officer of his county can do no better than "B-" in an online course on the Constitution. We would do well by requiring a similar course of anyone who is about to take an oath to support and uphold the constitutions of his state and his republic.)

http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/news/local/a1/article_c1ef32d8-5c9a-5ee0-bc36-7a935de6ea24.html
---

Rule Four Reminder: In January, the Johnston County [NC] Sheriff's Office got a call from a woman who said she was hiding in her closet. Her neighbors, she told the dispatcher, were target shooting next door and stray bullets had hit her fence and house. When deputies arrived, the target-shooting neighbor apologized and agreed to pay for any damage, a report shows. But since then, deputies have been called twice more to the 300 block of Condary Road - off of U.S. 301 between Selma and Micro - as residents expressed concerns about stray bullets. On June 25, the 9-1-1 dispatcher could hear the gunfire in the background, and last week, a neighbor called for deputies after he confronted the shooters and said they threatened him, though he hasn't pressed charges. But the owners of the shooting range, Eddie and Vickie Jordan, said they built berms to prevent stray bullets from hitting neighboring properties, and the couple said they made no threats. The Jordans own the Second Amen-ment Gun Store in Smithfield, and Eddie is pastor of Faith Baptist Church in Selma… (Rule Four: Always be sure of your target and what's beyond it. A berm is of limited value if it allows ricochets or if you let the muzzle rise above the horizontal.)

http://www.theherald-nc.com/2010/10/06/16047/stray-gunshots-worry-neighbors.html
---

Tangentially Related: Sue Krentz, widow of murdered Arizona rancher Rob Krentz and a member of this mailing list for many years, was seriously injured recently when she was struck by an uninsured drunk driver, while crossing a street in Douglas. If anyone would like to help her family with her extensive medical bills, contributions can be made at any Wells Fargo Bank to the Sue Krentz Recovery Fund (5206283169).
---



Monday, October 4, 2010

10-04-10


by permission from Stephen P. Wenger
http://www.spw-duf.info

comments in () by the same

---

More Coverage of MFFA Appeal: A Montana lawsuit that could undercut the authority of the federal government on issues including guns, marijuana, REAL ID, health care, the national guard, taxes and even law enforcement is poised to move to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. But even that august body is unlikely to resolve the contentions, since the authors of the original claim, which challenges the feds' authority to regulate guns made, sold and kept within a state, say they need the U.S. Supreme Court to act. "We've believed all along that the federal district court cannot grant the relief we request," said Gary Marbut, chief of the Montana Shooting Sports Association, which along with partner the Second Amendment Foundation brought the original lawsuit against the federal government. "We seek to overturn a half-century of bad precedent. Only the U.S. Supreme Court can do that. In that light the pending dismissal by the district court means little except that we are now free to move to the next step of the process," he said… Once the 9th Circuit rules, Marbut said, the plaintiffs intend to appeal any continuation of the dismissal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Or, he said, the 9th Circuit could return the case to the district court for trial… (The linked article includes a map of Firearms Freedom Acts across the US.)

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=210609
---

The Sky Is Falling!: Happy-hour beers were going for $5 at Past Perfect, a cavernous bar just off this city's [Nashville] strip of honky-tonks and tourist shops when Adam Ringenberg walked in with a loaded 9-millimeter pistol in the front pocket of his gray slacks. Mr. Ringenberg, a technology consultant, is one of the state's nearly 300,000 handgun permit holders who have recently seen their rights greatly expanded by a new law – one of the nation's first – that allows them to carry loaded firearms into bars and restaurants that serve alcohol. "If someone's sticking a gun in my face, I'm not relying on their charity to keep me alive," said Mr. Ringenberg, 30, who said he carries the gun for personal protection when he is not at work. Gun rights advocates like Mr. Ringenberg may applaud the new law, but many customers, waiters and restaurateurs here are dismayed by the decision… Tennessee is one of four states, along with Arizona, Georgia and Virginia, that recently enacted laws explicitly allowing loaded guns in bars. (Eighteen other states allow weapons in restaurants that serve alcohol.) The new measures in Tennessee and the three other states come after two landmark Supreme Court  rulings that citizens have an individual right – not just in connection with a well-regulated militia – to keep a loaded handgun for home defense… (According to the map at http://www.opencarry.org/restaurant.html, there are only seven states that do not allow firearms in restaurants that serve alcohol. I do not have the time to do a state-by-state search but there are several states that have not prohibited firearms in bars; some that come to mind are Indiana, Virginia, New Hampshire and New York. When we sought to distinguish bars from restaurants, under Arizona's Alcoholic Beverages Code, in order to make a strictly restaurant-carry bill, the move was opposed by the hospitality-industry lobby, in a failed gamble to block a "guns in bars" bill.)

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/04/us/04guns.html?_r=1&ref=us
---

The Beat Goes On: …The number of women and suburban residents obtaining concealed handgun permits is on the rise in Texas. According to the Department of Public Safety, last year nearly 31,000 women got a license to carry.  That is the most since the state started issuing permits 14 years ago.  The majority of those licenses went to people in Houston and the Dallas-Fort Worth suburbs. Overall, the state issued 139,000 handgun permits up from 86,000 in 2008… Not everyone thinks guns are the answer when it comes to protecting yourself… Another Austin resident said, "I don't believe that guns should be the first means of self protection; however, I'm respectful of each individual decision." That is an individual decision Robbins believes in. "I believe everybody should carry a gun or at least a right to carry a gun," Robbins said…

http://www.kvue.com/news/Concealed-handgun-permits-on-rise-in-Texas-104250008.html

After Barack Obama was elected president, many Texas gun owners feared they were on the verge of losing their Second Amendment rights — and they stocked up on weapons and ammunition. According to FBI statistics, the number of background checks for the purpose of firearms purchases in Texas increased 29 percent from 2007 to 2009. Texans also sought concealed handgun licenses: In 2009, nearly 139,000 permits were renewed or issued, the most in the history of the state's 15-year-old concealed-handgun law, according to statistics released by the Department of Public Safety… The number of CHL applications skyrocketed 61 percent between 2008 and 2009, from 86,000 to nearly 139,000. The number of licenses granted in 2009 equaled the total number issued in all of 2005 and 2006 combined. Tela Mange, a DPS spokeswoman, says the agency noticed the spike when employees processing the applications couldn't keep up. DPS was forced to hire temporary workers – and publicly urge applicants to submit paperwork online  - to tackle the backlog. "All of a sudden there was this application tsunami that buried us," Mange says. Mange says DPS isn't sure why handgun license requests spiked in 2009 and declines to hazard a guess. Some gun instructors, like Hoot Gibson of San Antonio, are perfectly happy to, insisting that Obama's election was a strong reason for the skyrocketing number of concealed-carry licenses. "That was the major contributing factor," Gibson says…

http://www.texastribune.org/texas-dept-criminal-justice/concealed-handgun-law/did-worries-about-obama-spark-chl-applications/

…The number of concealed handgun permits issued last year by the Pueblo County [CO] skyrocketed. The Sheriff's Office issued 545 permits in 2009, or 43 percent more than the 380 it issued in 2008. The 2009 figure is the largest in a seven-year period, officials said.
"I have given out more concealed handgun permits than in the history of the county of Pueblo. That's six or seven permits a day," first-term Sheriff Kirk Taylor said last week. Taylor said he is amazed at the spike in permits but didn't call it concerning. The surge is because of the 2008 election of Democratic President Barack Obama and, according to gun advocates, his track record on gun issues and the threat they say he possess to the Second Amendment right to bear arms…

http://www.chieftain.com/news/local/article_537e77a4-cf75-11df-8e94-001cc4c03286.html

Even in Costa Rica: The demand for permits to carry firearms has been such that the Dirección de Armas y Explosivos, del Ministerio de Seguridad Pública is now forced to open on Saturdays. Yesterday, 72 people from five security companies were served between the hours of 7:30am and 4:00pm. A bulletin from the Ministerio de Seguridad explains that due to the high demand, Saturdays will be dedicated to serve employees of security firms who have scheduled appointments during the week. The office, located next to the former Aresep building in La Sabana, can handle an application in only 15 minutes, handing over the permit to applicants who have previously applied and have been cleared. This while legislators analyze the various proposals, including one that was presented by Presidenta Laura Chinchilla was she was a legislator, to the laws to regulate private security firms and the use of firearms. Included in the proposals is the regulation on the purchase and possession of firearms, as well as the registration and purchase of ammunition, limiting the number of weapons a person can have to 3 and only those persons with permits be allowed to buy ammunition…

http://www.insidecostarica.com/dailynews/2010/october/03/costarica10100304.htm
---

Meanwhile, in Illinois…:
Illinois' next governor could very well be called on to act on legislation dealing with two of the more controversial non-budget issues that have divided lawmakers in recent years – concealed carry and same-sex unions. Attempts to legalize both have been tried but have fallen short in the General Assembly. However, advocates believe the climate for both issues may be changing in Springfield. That means the next governor during his term could be faced with signing or vetoing legislation allowing people to carry concealed guns or granting same-sex couples legal protections. Illinois is one of only two states that does not allow its residents to carry concealed weapons. It isn't for lack of trying. Nearly every year in the General Assembly, legislation is introduced to bring concealed carry to Illinois, and every year the legislation falls short of approval. Lawmakers from the urbanized northeast part of the state offset the votes of downstaters more sympathetic to concealed carry. "The climate is changing," said Todd Vandermyde, an Illinois lobbyist for the National Rifle Association. "I think we are closer than we have ever been. We will probably have the most aggressive year you've ever seen." If Republican state Sen. Bill Brady of Bloomington is in the Executive Mansion when concealed carry passes, the bill likely will be signed into law…

http://www.sj-r.com/state/x1616323976/Civil-unions-concealed-carry-could-confront-next-governor
---

Viewed from the Left:
The history of civil rights in America is long and multi-faceted, from Rosa Parks keeping her seat on the bus to the Stonewall riots. And now to five guys packing heat while having ButterBurgers at Culver's. Welcome to civil rights 2010. Pro-gun activists are careful not to equate the open-carry movement with the epic struggles of blacks and gays to win basic civil rights, but they see plenty of parallels… The open-carry movement is gaining momentum across the country, and the Sept. 18 confrontation between Madison police and five armed men having dinner at an east-side Culver's has become a rallying point both in Wisconsin and nationwide… Despite the surge of support, the assertion that gun rights and gay rights go hand-in-hand doesn't sit well with everyone. "I don't think it's a very positive connection," says Steve Starkey, executive director of OutReach, Madison's LGBT Community Center. "We have enough challenges trying to win our rights and to talk about the ways we're discriminated against without affiliating with a group that's talking about gun rights." …A few days ago, the city of San Diego ended an open carry case with a $35,000 settlement. That case was settled only weeks after a proposal to outlaw carrying firearms in public died in the California legislature. Other city governments, including Norfolk, Va., and Gonzales, La., have paid out cash to settle federal lawsuits in favor of gun carriers in recent years… (For those who don't recognize it, the Stonewall riots were a response to a police raid on a gay bar in NYC. For such a well researched and even-handed article, I'm surprised to see no mention of Pink Pistols, a gay-oriented RKBA organization.)

http://host.madison.com/ct/news/local/govt_and_politics/article_9fa0c010-cf48-11df-ad8f-001cc4c03286.html
---

Las Vegas – in the Wake of the Inquest: At the moment he was shot by three Las Vegas police officers in front of a Costco store on a July afternoon, Erik Scott had potentially fatal levels of the painkiller morphine and the anti-anxiety drug Xanax in his system. Prosecutors during last week's inquest used that information, along with the testimony of Scott's doctors, to paint a picture of the West Point graduate as a prescription drug addict who battled chronic pain. But when the three officers took the stand to testify at the inquest, they said they were never drug- or alcohol-tested after the shooting. Nor was there a blood test for Detective Bryan Yant, the narcotics officer who fired into a darkened bathroom while serving a search warrant on 21-year-old Trevon Cole in June. Cole's blood test results – positive for marijuana use – came up in the inquest into his death. Why the difference in treatment? The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, like most departments nationwide, does not test its officers after critical incidents unless there is a "reasonable suspicion" the officer is under the influence…

http://www.lvrj.com/news/sheriff--police-drug-test-policy--under-review--in-wake-of-scott-case-104231799.html

Costco Wholesale Corporation on Wednesday released a statement addressing the officer-involved shooting of Erik Scott outside its Summerlin store in July. The statement calls Scott's death tragic and touches on the recent criticism from Scott's father that the store "killed Erik." …Company leaders insist employees acted responsibly when they called police and ordered an evacuation of the store after seeing Scott was armed and acting erratically while shopping in the sporting goods aisle. An employee testified that Scott became belligerent after being told of the policy banning guns in the store. The company said it has learned of an upcoming protest at the store, in which managers will be urged to fire employees involved in the incident. "Such actions can only be intended to inflame public sentiment in connection with planned litigation, and have no reasonable relationship to the cause of Mr. Scott's untimely death," the statement reads… (Costco has a long historical link opposition to the RKBA. After merging with Price Club, it was previously known as PriceCostco. Solomon Price, founder of Price Club, was a major contributor to California's 1982 Propostion 15, which would have banned further sales of handguns to private citizens in that state. To my knowledge, Costco still donates to prohibitionist groups, such as the Brady Bunch.)

http://www.fox5vegas.com/news/25216283/detail.html

Costco's Statement:

http://www.fox5vegas.com/news/25216062/detail.html
---

ISRA Calls for Boycott of AON: The ISRA is calling upon all lawful American firearm owners to stop doing business with AON Corporation and its subsidiaries.  This call for a boycott comes after published reports disclosed that AON is bankrolling a fundraiser for the political arm of the nation's most radical gun control organization.  Not only is the fundraiser being financed by AON, it is also being held in a posh club atop AON's Chicago headquarters. The October 4th event, which AON will hold on behalf of the "Brady Campaign Against Gun Violence," will raise money to fund the Brady Campaign's efforts to impose severe restrictions on citizens' 2nd Amendment rights.  Such restrictions include bans on civilian ownership of handguns, target rifles, and popular hunting firearms.  The Brady organization also seeks to shutter small firearm retailers and prohibit law-abiding citizens from using firearms to protect their homes and their families…

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/isra-calls-for-nationwide-boycott-of-aon-insurance-products-104251428.html
http://www.aon.com/default.jsp
---


Rule One, Two, Three Reminder:
A Southwest Florida man is recovering after accidentally shooting himself in the face while trying to fight off a skunk. Daniel McDaniels, 31, was at a friend's house Friday when he spotted the skunk. He grabbed a .22-caliber rifle and began loading it with the butt of the rifle on the ground. Manatee County Sheriff's deputies said McDaniels didn't know the gun already had a round in it when he accidentally tripped the trigger, setting off the gun. The bullet pierced the fingers of his right hand and entered his left cheek. His injuries are not life-threatening. (It sounds as though he was loading a tubular magazine, as is usually found mounted below the barrel on most lever-action rifles and a few .22 autoloaders. I'm not familiar with the situation in Florida but rabid skunks are not unusual in most of Arizona – beware of any non-domesticated animal that approaches you, particularly skunks and raccoons. The Rules are posted at http://www.spw-duf.info/safety.html.)

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/blotter/florida-man-trying-to-shoo-skunk-accidentally-shoots-951349.html?cxtype=ynews_rss
---

From South Africa: Cecelia Steynberg was awoken by the constant barking of her dogs at about 3.15am on Wednesday, spokesperson Sergeant Puleng Motsoeneng said. When she went to investigate she saw a man entering her room with a firearm. She fired a warning shot, but the man continued bearing down on her. She fired another shot, hitting him in the neck. The man is in hospital. (I don't know how the courts view warning shots in South Africa but I would not risk one when an intruder is clearly armed with his own firearm. Among other issues, if a gunfight is on, I may end up needing he extra round.)

http://www.sowetanlive.co.za/news/2010/10/01/farmer_s-wife-shoots-would-be-robber

Speaking of Warning Shots…:
A Sunday morning dispute over dogs turned into a shootout, Bay County [FL] Sheriff's deputies said. No one was injured in the incident, but Garry Alexander, 64, was arrested and charged with aggravated assault, deputies wrote in an arrest affidavit. Alexander was "highly intoxicated" when he stepped onto his neighbor's property on Marvin Lane in Southport and began yelling at her about her dogs, deputies wrote, adding that he had a .357 Magnum Taurus revolver in his hand… His neighbor, Janet Keesecker, 49, who works as a manager at a local gas station and was outside when Alexander arrived, grabbed her .38 special from her vehicle and tried to go back into her house, she said. But before she could get back into the house, Alexander fired, Keesecker said during a Sunday afternoon interview. "When he shot the first one, it just missed me," she added. "I didn't even know he was that close with his weapon." Keesecker entered her house and fired once back at Alexander, she said. "I wasn't aiming for anything. I thought if I just shot it he would leave," she added. Instead of retreating, Alexander fired two more shots at Keesecker's house, authorities said. This time, Keesecker stayed inside the home and waited to see what Alexander would do next… (Rule Four: Always be sure of your target and what's beyond it.)

http://www.newsherald.com/news/fire-87452-returns-shoots.html

Friday, October 1, 2010

10-01-10


By permission from: Stephen P. Wenger
http://www.spw-duf.info
comments in () by the same


---

GOA Releases Congressional Ratings:
With one of the biggest elections of our lifetimes only a month away, Gun Owners of America has now released its Congressional Ratings for the House and Senate. Democrats have taken a radical turn to the left under the leadership of liberal anti-gunners like Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Barack Obama, and the electorate is ready to make a correction. There is no doubt that the country is at a crossroads, with America's Constitutional Republic hanging in the balance. So the GOA Rating Guide is your tool for cutting through the bull that candidates are throwing at you during this election season. Candidates who have established a voting record, either in the office for which they are running or in another elected office, are evaluated primarily on the basis of that voting record.   If an incumbent or challenger has not established a voting record or demonstrated his or her position in some other way, that candidate is evaluated on the basis of his or her responses to the GOA 2010 Federal Candidate Questionnaire. You can go to http://gunowners.org/2010-candidate-ratings-guide.htm to see the ratings of every candidate on Second Amendment issues… To learn more about candidates endorsed by Gun Owners of American Political Victory Fund, please visit www.goapvf.org.

http://gunowners.org/a093010.htm
http://gunowners.org/2010-candidate-ratings-guide.htm
http://www.goapvf.org/
---

From Jeff Knox: Attacks on Sharron Angle, constitutional conservative Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Nevada, have been eclipsed in the national media recently by attacks on Christine O'Donnell, constitutional conservative Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Delaware, but the attacks on Angle continue in Nevada – where they really count. These attacks on Angle and O'Donnell – and indeed on all of the constitutional conservative candidates – follow a premeditated formula to discredit the candidates and shift attention to some personal trait, belief or experience and away from any substantive debate… They leave the clear suggestion that anyone who believes the Second Amendment means what it says, or who thinks lower taxes can generate more tax revenue, or that the federal government should not do things which it is not authorized to do in the Constitution – good, important, helpful, "for the children" things – should be dismissed as a "radical" and an "extremist," a "nut-job," and basically an idiot, out of touch with the mainstream (and reality) and clearly unfit to hold public office…

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=210041
---

From Larry Pratt: Many Americans recently lamented the six-month anniversary of ObamaCare, a law that is guaranteed to result in tremendous violations of our gun rights. How do we know that? We know because of what the feds have already been doing with legislation that George Bush signed two years ago. With the passage of the Veterans Disarmament Act in 2008, Congress granted the Veterans Administration (VA) the authority to computerize the medical records of veterans and ship them to the FBI. Any diagnosis that could be interpreted as "might be a danger to self or others" results in the vet being denied his right to keep and bear arms. People with concealed carry permits are denied renewals. Customers at gun stores are turned down. In one recent case, a GOA member visited a VA hospital for a couple of days and soon after returning home, state authorities knocked on the door and confiscated his guns. There is a campaign at the VA to come in and get the "treatment you deserve." TV ads to this effect have been run. Obama has announced new regulations to make it easier for war vets to get help. Warning: With help like this, you don't need enemies…

http://www2.hernandotoday.com/content/2010/oct/01/you-have-be-nuts-see-shrink/news-opinion-editorial/
---

MFFA – Next Stop, Ninth Circuit: A federal judge in Missoula has dismissed a lawsuit by gun rights advocates and states seeking freedom from federal gun laws, a move that the advocates promised to appeal. The decision Wednesday from U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy was expected since his magistrate a month ago recommended tossing out the lawsuit because Congress has the authority to regulate firearms with its constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce. Molloy sided with the U.S. Department of Justice, which argued Congress' ability to regulate guns and other items through the "commerce clause" of the U.S. Constitution had long ago been decided in courts. The lawsuit involving Montana, Utah, Alabama, Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Wyoming and West Virginia argued that states should decide which rules, if any, would control the sale and purchase of guns and paraphernalia made inside their borders. The 10th Amendment of the Constitution assures that the federal government only has those powers that are specifically given to it by the Constitution, the states said…

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hX-wisTxWMzVFAvXNcdOwK8EXubgD9IIFV3O0?docId=D9IIFV3O0
---

Chicago Mayor Sidesteps Self-Defense Shooting: Mayor Daley, who's always happy to condemn guns, doesn't want to talk about the senior who Wednesday shot the boy who was throwing bricks at her and her house. "No, this is strictly on topic," Daley said. WLS-AM's Bill Cameron asked Daley at a Thursday morning news conference, but they mayor only wanted to talk about a new volunteer program. "The reason we're on topic is so we can get those who spoke, not only Mayor Daley but others, so the media maybe can report about the press conference," Daley said. So what does Daley plan to volunteer for next year after he leaves office? "I'll tell you that when I'm out of office," Daley said. The elderly South Side woman defending herself with a gun is precisely why gun rights groups and the Supreme Court say Americans have a right to bear arms.

http://www.wlsam.com/Article.asp?id=1970466&spid=
---

San Diego Settles Open-Carry-Arrest Lawsuit: … I've had to hold this in for almost two years but now the case is settled so I'm free to post. I believe that following the arrest and my claim against the city of San Diego, some factions at SDPD conspired with Saldana to cobble together AB1934, (a so-incredibly-unConstitutional piece of legislation that it boggles the mind) which spectacularly failed at the last minute. It wasn't all bad though. Some cops got educated, Saldana got put in her place, and best of all The Responsible Citizens of California was founded… (Lengthy transcript of the arrest incident, which also included a refusal to provide identification, accounts for six separate pages. The introduction to the account states that the city got off with a settlement of $35,000.)

http://www.examiner.com/la-in-los-angeles/open-carry-false-arrest-costs-san-diego-35-000-part-1
http://www.examiner.com/la-in-los-angeles/open-carry-false-arrest-costs-san-diego-35-000-part-2
http://www.examiner.com/la-in-los-angeles/open-carry-false-arrest-costs-san-diego-35-000-part-3
http://www.examiner.com/la-in-los-angeles/open-carry-false-arrest-costs-san-diego-35-000-part-4
http://www.examiner.com/la-in-los-angeles/open-carry-false-arrest-costs-san-diego-35-000-part-5
http://www.examiner.com/la-in-los-angeles/open-carry-false-arrest-costs-san-diego-35-000-part-6
---

Wisconsin Open-Carry Incident, More Details: Here's the recording of the 911 call that triggered charges against five citizens for lawfully carrying holstered handguns. It's definitely worth listening to it. It's very intriguing how the operator, after advising the caller that open carry is legal decides that there may be an issue if the woman was concerned enough to call. I certainly hope a jury gets to hear this recording.

http://tijil.org/Madison_5_911_call.mp3


And an Inane Commentary: Five pistol-packin' strangers recently scared the dickens out of a 62-year-old woman at a Madison Culver's, and she called the cops. But now the cops are the ones who are in trouble. They'd walked into a piece of Second Amendment street theater and not an armed stand off. But they didn't know that until they demanded some ID and explanation from the gunslingers. It turns out that cops can't do that in Wisconsin, and these officers were set up by Wisconsin Carry, a gun rights group, to show cheeseheads they live in an oppressive police state. And just to drive the point home, Wisconsin Carry is now suing the city of Madison and its police chief, claiming the cops engaged in a "blatant and defenseless violation of the rights of law-abiding citizens." Those officers really should have known the guys packing heat were law abiding, just by sniffing the air for their good intentions. And we'd like to congratulate members of Wisconsin Carry on securing their Second Amendment rights, while scaring ButterBurger fans. (Hart Van Denburg does not appear to have listened to the 911 tape, linked above.)

http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2010/09/wisconsin_culve.php
---

Meanwhile, In Washington…: On the heels of a Sept. 28 encounter between an Open Carry activist and four Pierce County Sheriff's deputies at a Spanaway Starbucks, more than a dozen members of OpenCarry.org are planning to gather at the same coffee shop on Saturday at 10 a.m. in a show of support for their comrade. The incident has sparked outrage on the Open Carry forum, primarily because the armed citizen in this case managed to capture most of it on audio, and there is a link provided on the website. It is worth a listen so everyone can make up their own minds about this. Jim Beal, the always-articulate SeaTac-based activist who has brought Open Carry to the headlines more than once in Washington State, told this column that he will be there and he expects "between 15 and 20" other activists to also converge on the event, at 15803 Pacific Avenue South. It may be one more opportunity for the Open Carry crowd to show its financial support for Starbucks, which stood up to the Brady Bunch campaign of hysteria…

http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-in-seattle/open-carry-group-plans-saturday-solidarity-gathering-pierce-county
---

Where's Waldo (the Gunrunner)?:
Searches of vehicles crossing into Mexico are yielding few weapons in what U.S. officials concede is a frustrating effort to slow the flow of guns to violent Mexican cartels operating across the U.S. border. Almost immediately after Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced a stepped-up vehicle search program beginning in March 2009, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials went five consecutive months – May through September – without recovering a single weapon in El Paso, within sight of the bloodiest battleground in the Mexican drug war. Weapons seizures from vehicles moving through the Southwest border's busiest crossings have increased to 310 so far in fiscal year 2010, up from 155 in fiscal year 2009, CBP records show. Besides guns, weapons include grenades and rockets. Yet the seizures represent a tiny fraction of arms flooding Mexico from the USA, at a rate of 2,000 per day, according to Brookings Institution estimates… (Could it be that Brookings and the media are mistaken? Could it be that the cartels in Ciudad Juárez are getting their weapons from Mexican military and police sources? I do not see grenades and rockets in Arizona gun shops or gun shows. If they have been seized in El Paso, they most likely were stolen from Fort Bliss.)

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-09-30-weapons-mexico-border_N.htm?csp=usat.me
---

National Bank of Arizona/Zions Bank, Utah: I just got off the phone with a customer-service supervisor at Zions Bank in Salt Lake City UT. Zions is the parent bank of National Bank of Arizona, which earlier this week posted "no firearms" - using the official sign for bars and restaurants that serve alcohol and prefer to maintain defenseless-victim zones. Jane Seegmiller informed me that she was advised to tell me that the bank has the right to post those signs and that corporate headquarters stands behind the Arizona decision to do so. Needless to say, my funds will be moving out of National Bank shortly and I encourage other customers of National Bank and Zions Bank to do the same.
---

Bringing an Attitude to a Gunfight: Brains and brawn allowed Rep. Tim Solobay to fend off four hooded youths who held him up at gunpoint Tuesday night in Harrisburg [PA]. "One of them said something like, 'Give me all your money,'" said Solobay, a Democrat from Canonsburg who is the volunteer fire chief there. First, he lunged at two of them, slamming them into his Dodge Durango. Three of the four ran away, Solobay said. Solobay, 54, then climbed into his truck and closed the door before he looked out the window and saw the barrel of a pistol pointed at his face. Seconds later, he turned on the vehicle's fire siren, and the last attacker fled… (The list member who furnished this link advises that Solobay is a co-sponsor to Pennsylvania's current castle-doctrine bill but did not comment on why he was not armed.)

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/valleynewsdispatch/s_701905.html
---

Rule Four Reminder: An American woman who says she killed her husband after mistaking him for a bear while hunting in Newfoundland has been found not guilty of criminal negligence causing death in the fatal shooting. A judge delivered his verdict Friday in the trial of Mary Beth Harshbarger of Meshoppen, Pennsylvania, in the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador. Harshbarger told authorities she mistook her 42-year-old husband for a bear while the two were hunting in central Newfoundland in 2006. She had pleaded not guilty. The prosecution said Harshbarger showed disregard for safety when she fired her rifle at her husband. The defense portrayed the death as an accident. Harshbarger would have faced a sentence of four years to life in prison if she had been convicted. (Rule Four: Always be sure of your target and what's beyond it.)

http://townhall.com/news/world/2010/10/01/hunter_who_shot_husband_found_not_guilty
---

Tangentially Related: To protect the nation's air travelers, federal air marshals deployed after the 2001 terrorist attacks try to travel incognito, often in pairs, and choose flights identified with the potential to fall under threat. And they almost always fly first class – something some airlines would like to change. With cockpit doors fortified and a history of attackers choosing coach seats, some airline executives and security experts question whether the first-class practice is really necessary – or even a good idea. It could weaken security by isolating marshals or making them easier for terrorists to identify, airline executives say. With more threats in the coach cabin now, first-class clustering may not make as much security sense. Security experts say bombers are a bigger threat today than knife-wielding attackers trying to get through secure cockpit doors, and Transportation Security Administration checkpoints are heavily focused on explosives, whether hidden in shoes, liquids or under clothes. Some believe bombers try to target areas over the wing – a structurally critical location and also the site of fuel storage – to cause the most damage to the aircraft… (Color me cynical. While I claim no knowledge of where the marshals actually sit or where it makes the most sense for them to sit, I suspect that the biggest concern of the airlines is to get back more high-dollar first-class seat to sell to the public. It was the airlines that lobbied to end the original requirement that pilots of all planes carrying US mail be armed and they have not been supporters of the Federal Flight Deck Officer program. A 2004 book, Never Again: A Self-Defense Guide for the Flying Public, was marketed to the public after the airline industry rejected the program to train cabin personnel to resist skyjackers.)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703431604575521832473932878.html?mod=djemLifeStyle_h

Followers

Blog Archive