Wednesday, January 27, 2010

01-27-10

by permission from Stephen P. Wenger

comments in () by the same
http://www.spw-duf.info

NRA Hit for McDonald Role: Yesterday the Supreme Court granted the
NRA's motion for divided argument in McDonald v. Chicago.  What this
means is that Alan Gura's 30 minutes of argument time on behalf of
Chicagoland gun owners just became 20, with 10 going to former
Solicitor General Paul Clement, whom the NRA hired at the last minute
to pursue this motion and argument.  (Full disclosure: Alan Gura is a
friend of mine, and of Cato.) The NRA's motion was premised on the
idea that Alan had not fully presented the substantive due process
argument for selective incorporation of the Second Amendment -
presumably out of an outsized concern for the Privileges or Immunities
Clause arguments about which I've previously blogged and written a law
review article.  This is a highly unusual argument and is a facial
slap at Alan's abilities as an advocate.  Sadly, it's also typical of
how the NRA has behaved throughout this case and before that during
the Heller litigation - sabotaging Alan at every turn and showing
again and again that, even in the face of winning arguments that fully
support its legal positions, the NRA prefers to seek glory for itself
rather than presenting the strongest case for its purported
constituency of gun owners… If the NRA were concerned about the final
outcome of the case, it would be unlikely to attack Alan's strategy or
question his preparation (an odd way to be "helpful" to one's side).
It is not a stretch to predict that this case will be favorably
decided at least in part on due process grounds, however, so what we
are seeing here is likely an attempt by the NRA to position itself as
responsible for such a victory - and that Alan isn't. Ultimately,
then, the NRA is engaging here in fundraising, not liberty-promotion
or ethical lawyering.

http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2010/01/26/nra-cares-more-about-nra-than-gun-rights-liberty-professional-courtesy/
---

Gun-Free Zones Attract Terrorists, Part 2: Yesterday we took a look at
the effect gun free zones can have on the target selection process by
terrorists, whether foreign or domestic. Since the goal of such an
attack is to cause as much death and destruction as possible, it is
logical that a location where civilians are prohibited from owning
firearms would be a more attractive target. Examples of terrorist
attacks and shooting sprees halted by armed citizens, whether law
enforcement or otherwise, support this hypothesis. One thing that our
public officials can be maddeningly good at is taking the wrong course
of action in an attempt to "do something." Some nutcase tries to light
his shoes on fire on an airplane and the next thing you know millions
of people are shuffling through security checkpoints in their stocking
feet. So the next amateur terrorist sticks the destructive compound in
his underwear instead. Net result: zero…

http://www.examiner.com/x-2206-Cleveland-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m1d26-Do-gun-free-zones-attract-terrorists--Part-II
---

Colorado RKBA Activists May Sue over Campus-Carry Ban: A coalition of
Second Amendment advocates is threatening to sue CSU because of the
university system's proposed ban on carrying concealed weapons on
campuses and said it has the support of Larimer County Sheriff Jim
Alderden in opposing the ban. The Rocky Mountain Gun Owners group is
planning a Feb. 1 news conference at which Alderden is expected to
declare that he will not jail anyone caught violating the proposed
policy. Without elaborating, Alderden on Monday confirmed his position
to the Coloradoan. Colorado State University is one of the sole public
universities that permits people to carry concealed weapons on its
campuses. The CSU Board of Governors next month will consider a ban on
all weapons on campus. That ban would extend to people who have
concealed weapons permits but also would apply to pellet guns and
Tasers…

http://www.coloradoan.com/article/20100126/NEWS01/1260330/Coalition-threatening-to-sue-CSU-because-of-weapons-ban-proposal
---

Hypocrisy in Washington "AWB" Hearing: More than 300 Washington gun
owners descended on the John A. Cherberg Building in Olympia Tuesday
morning for a hearing on SB 6396, the so-called "assault weapons" ban
legislation sponsored by Senate Judiciary Chairman Adam Kline.
Opponents of the bill vastly outnumbered its supporters, and for many
in the audience who had traveled several hours to reach the capitol,
it was disappointing that Kline allowed only 30 minutes for the
hearing, and only a handful of speakers – evenly divided between pro
and con – were allowed to speak. The crowd spilled out into the
hallway, and at least a couple of auxiliary hearing rooms were jammed.
What may become a focus of the hearing because of its subliminal
theatrics was the appearance by Bellevue Police Chief Linda Pillo in
support of the Kline bill. Several in the audience, including National
Rifle Association lobbyist Brian Judy, were astonished when Pillo
claimed to be "here today representing myself and my personal
opinions," yet she was in full uniform, complete with duty belt and
sidearm…

http://www.examiner.com/x-4525-Seattle-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m1d26-Turnout-heavy-in-opposition-to-WA-assault-weapon-bill-Bellevue-police-chief-plays-politics
---

Ohio – Hunting and CCW: It was just a few years ago that Buckeye
Firearms Association, along with support from the NRA, led the effort
to obtain the ability for concealed handgun license holders to carry
concealed while hunting. Working with the law enforcement side of the
Division of Wildlife and with a major effort at the spring open house
events by Buckeye Firearms supporters and volunteers, we were able to
accomplish the goal without additional legislation… At that time
emphasis for protection centered on the explosion of meth labs and the
use of remote locations and wildlife areas as dumping grounds for the
waste by-products of meth production. Since hunters were likely to be
the ones out early and in remote areas, we felt they were at the most
risk of surprising meth lab operators dumping or of bumping into a
wanted felon. Since the hunting firearm could not legally be loaded
before or after hunting hours, hunters were effectively disarmed while
leaving or returning to their vehicles…

http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/7082
---

Parking-Lot-Storage Bills Advance in Indiana: The Indiana state
senate, in a commanding, 41-9 vote, decided Monday to protect
employees' right to store firearms in their locked vehicles.  The
bill, SB 25, would prevent empoyers (with a few exceptions) from
prohibiting workers from keeping firearms locked in their vehicles
parked on company parking lots… The failure of last year's similar
legislation notwithstanding, supporters might have more grounds for
optimism this year, as the House version, HB 1065, seems to have some
momentum behind it, having passed a committee vote by a 10-1 margin…

http://www.examiner.com/x-2581-St-Louis-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m1d26-Indiana-moves-closer-to-protecting-workers-right-to-keep-firearms-in-parking-lot
---

California Coffee Chain Posts Gun Ban: The notice posted in the window
of the Peet's Coffee & Tea seemed out of place. It was from the Peet's
corporate office letting the public know about a policy that prohibits
customers from carrying firearms. A closer look, however, uncovered a
bigger issue and a movement. There are pro-gun groups encouraging
Americans to come out of the closet and exercise your right to carry a
firearm. Open Carry Dot Org is becoming a force in this drive; it's
even influencing lawmaking all over the country. "An armed society is
a polite society" says Walter Stanley, an Open Carry advocate. But
Stanley and a group of his believers walked into a Peet's in San Ramon
with guns strapped to their hips. The San Jose Mercury News chronicled
the moment with videotape. But the truth is: they did nothing illegal.
It's not against the law to carry a gun in plain sight in California.
But, that gun must be worn in a holster and it cannot be loaded.
Stanley says, "There have been studies that show that law abiding
citizens, with more guns out there on the street. That equals less
crime and I'm all for that." …

http://www.fox40.com/news/headlines/ktxl-news-gunsandpeets,0,2623007.story
---

California Samaritan Faces Felony Charge: A young man from Arnold will
appear in court today on felony allegations that he negligently
discharged a weapon. Paul Mandell, 19, fired his 20-guage shotgun
twice at around 10 a.m. Dec. 29 in an attempt to defend himself and
prevent a man accused of assaulting a woman from leaving the scene, he
said… According to Mandell, Souza continued to yell and became even
more upset. Mandell again told him that he didn't need to go anywhere
because the cops were on their way. At that point, Souza indicated he
was going to leave and walked over to his late-model Ford F-150 and
got in. "If you get in your truck we're going to have a problem,"
Mandell said. "That's the time I leveled my gun at him. I told him,
'If you don't get out of the truck, we're going to have some issues.'
I stood in front of the truck, about 10 feet away. He would have to go
right through me to leave." Souza then started the truck and began to
drive forward, Mandell said, adding that he felt threatened by Souza's
actions. "When I heard him put his foot on the gas, I shot out his
driver's-side front tire," Mandell said. "It didn't stop him. He kept
coming, a little more, so I sidestepped the vehicle and shot out the
back tire driver's side, at which point he stopped." …"All in all, I
wish I had handled things differently but I stand by my decisions,"
Mandell said. "Had I been more awake, I probably wouldn't have gone
outside." …(What threat would there have been to innocent human life
if Souza had driven off, to be contacted at a later time by police?
Most people don't realize that the first few minutes they are awake,
they are actually functioning as though they were just over the legal
line of alcohol intoxication.)

http://www.calaverasenterprise.com/articles/2010/01/26/news/news03_samaritan.txt
---

Oops, Wrong House: A burglar was shot Tuesday morning by a homeowner
in Spartanburg County [SC]. The incident happened at a home at 632
Nodding Hill Road about 9:30 Tuesday morning. According to the
Spartanburg County Sheriff's Office, deputies found Rick Clary
standing in the driveway of his home, shotgun in hand. Clary told
investigators that he was asleep inside the home when he heard the
sound of breaking glass. He then said he grabbed his shotgun, went to
the backdoor, and saw someone reaching through the broken door window,
trying to unlock the door. Clary fired one shot at the suspect, saying
he believed he hit the suspect with the shot. Two suspects fled on
foot, but left a car registered to Apple Auto Rental, along with a 9mm
pistol. The pistol turned out to be stolen. Soon afterwards, a
16-year-old male juvenile arrived at a local emergency room, suffering
from shotgun wounds to his hand and forearm. Investigators were able
to determine that the teen was one of the individuals involved in the
break-in. The juvenile, identified as Jamarous Rogers, has been
charged as an adult, with one count each of Burglary 1st Degree and
Possession of a Weapon during a Violent Crime. Investigators are
searching for two more suspects.

http://www2.wspa.com/spa/news/local/article/spartanburg_deputies_investigate_home_invasion_shooting/32375/
---

New York FFL Stung by F Troop: The owner of Panunzio's Guns, Route 37,
said he was duped by federal authorities when he sold a rifle to a
woman he later learned was an undercover agent… Mr. Panunzio said he
recalled a man visiting the shop several months ago looking to buy a
rifle. "The fellow came in once before and filled out the proper
papers and was denied," Mr. Panunzio said. "He came back a month or
two later with a woman. She filled out the papers and wasn't denied."
Mr. Panunzio said that until he was informed by ATF agents Tuesday, he
didn't know the Browning rifle sold to the woman actually was for the
man who was denied ownership. He said he also was told both
conversations were recorded by the undercover agents… (So a
79-year-old man is expected to make the connection with a NICS denial
two months earlier? When I rode in LASD traffic units we used to joke
about "DWO," Driving While Old. It sounds as though it is now becoming
illegal to be "FFLWO.")

http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20100127/NEWS05/301279948
---

Guns = Anger?: …I'd been a crack marksman as a youth and a gunnery
officer in the Navy, where I'd been able to fire the gamut of small
arms as well as the 5-inch guns on my ship. So it was no surprise
that, after moving to Washington and seeing an ad for a pistol range
in Northern Virginia, I went to the range one afternoon and shot off a
box of ammo. It was kind of fun, and I had the usual number of
bull's-eyes. Afterward, there was a little conversation in my head
that taught me something. It went like this: "Do I want to do this
again or maybe buy a gun?" The answer was no. So I asked myself a
question, "Why not?" It surprised me when the answer came back, like a
voice spoken by someone else in my head: "Because I'm not angry." …
(If this guy dies at the hands of a violent criminal, I assume it will
be with a pleasant smile on his face.)

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/local-opinions/2010/01/why_i_stopped_needing_a_gun.html?hpid=voicesopinion
---

More Firearm Ignorance: Authorities in central New Jersey seized a
cache of weapons and ammunition including rifles, a grenade launcher
and a night vision scope from the motel room of a Virginia man
arrested early Monday by officers responding to a report of a
suspicious person, MyFoxDC.com reported… Forrest said Woodson was
wearing a bulletproof vest and carrying a semiautomatic Bushmaster
rifle concealed under his green, military-style jacket when officers
encountered him at a Quick Chek store in Branchburg shortly before 4
a.m. Monday… Forrest said the .223-caliber assault rifle that Woodson
was carrying had a defaced serial number and had been altered to fire
.50-caliber ammunition… (The AR-15 platform is designed in a manner
that allows the lower receiver, legally the firearm, to accept a wide
variety of upper receivers, including of different calibers. There is
at least one company selling .50-caliber uppers for AR-15's
[http://www.alexanderarms.com/siteshopper.htm?cat=14&item=20], a
concept developed for the US Coast Guard, which sought such a firearm
for breeching purposes. Additionally, Bushmaster now offers a couple
of non-AR-15 rifles chambered in .50 BMG as well as a couple of
AR-15's chambered in their proprietary .450 Bushmaster caliber. None
of these remarks are intended to mitigate any criminal intent on the
part of Woodson.)

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,583912,00.html
---

Hunter Novel – Plenty of Errors: …I know Mr. Hunter is writing
fiction, but I wish he had stayed away from trying to make readers
think he might be writing about Carlos Hathcock. Because in doing so,
he diminishes the memory of one of the most modest, generous patriots
of the 20th century. Moreover, the book contains multiple reporting
errors. Mr. Hunter should have been more diligent, especially because
he is being marketed by his publisher as an expert on matters
tactical. The 7.62x51 168-grain boat tail hollow-point bullet, for
example is, according to Mr. Hunter, "unanimously used in its Federal
or Black Hills loading by most SWAT teams as well as nearly all Army,
Marine Corps, Air Force, and Navy dedicated marksmen, combat or
otherwise. It was the magic bean that terminated the lives of three
Somali pirates in April '09 in one well-coordinated moment."
Unanimously? Not quite. Law enforcement does indeed rely on the
168-grain round. Most military snipers, however, use the 175-grain,
Open Tip Match M118 LR round (although many will soon use the heavier
7.62x67 .300 Winchester Magnum). And special-operations snipers use
whatever's best for the job, which can vary from the 168-grain
MatchKing for shorter shots, to 300-grain 338 Lapua Magnum or highly
specialized 7.62 rounds for longer ranges. The Somali pirates,
according to multiple sources in more than one special
operations/asymmetric warfare unit, were dispatched by 77-grain
MatchKings fired from .223 EBRs (enhanced battle rifles), not 7.62
weapons…

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jan/27/stylish-but-wrong-on-guns/
---

Three Indicted for Embezzling Glock: Three men have been indicted in
Georgia for allegedly trying to steal $3 million from gun maker Glock.
The indictment handed down by an Atlanta-area grand jury Friday says
the three men conspired from 2000 until early last year to steal the
money. Jeffery Pombert, James Harper III and Jerry Chapman are charged
with theft by taking and violation of a state racketeering law. The
indictment says Harper worked as an outside legal counsel for
Austrian-based Glock's U.S. headquarters in Smyrna, near Atlanta. It
said the men transferred funds and assets from Glock to personal bank
accounts they had set up. Harper and Pombert have been released from
Cobb County jail on bond. Chapman was still in jail Tuesday. The
company said Tuesday it has no comment.

http://www.poststar.com/news/national/article_4fc59287-7621-5ce6-bd29-ed74e329d5ce.html
---

Tangentially Related: Responding to an executive order by President
Obama, a new push is under way for states to adopt laws limiting the
use of their National Guard units unless there is an invasion,
insurrection or other limited circumstance. As WND reported, Obama's
order establishes a new "Council of Governors" designated to advise on
the "synchronization and integration of state and federal military
activities in the United States." The recent order, posted on the
White House website, was accompanied by the explanation that the group
is to work "to protect our nation against all types of hazards." It
comes just weeks after the president issued a similarly obscure order
vastly expanding INTERPOL's privileges in the U.S. The White House
said the new council is to include governors and administration
officials to review "such matters as involving the National Guard of
the various states; homeland defense, civil support; synchronization
and integration of state and federal military activities in the United
States; and other matters of mutual interest pertaining to National
Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities." However, there
was no definition of the group's authority. Can the council recommend
"military activities" and can the governors, who already are in
command of their own state guard units, mandate activities outside of
their areas of jurisdiction? The White House did not respond to WND
questions on the issue…

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=122689
---

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

01-26-10

by permission from: Stephen P. Wenger
comments in () by the same
http://www.spw-duf.info

NRA Granted Time to Argue in McDonald: The Supreme Court this morning
granted a motion by the National Rifle Association for argument time
March 2, when the justices will consider whether the Second Amendment
individual right to bear arms applies against state and local
restrictions on firearms. The NRA will take an unspecified number of
minutes from the plaintiffs who are challenging Chicago's gun
restrictions, and who are represented by Alan Gura of Gura & Possessky
of D.C. and Virginia. The case is McDonald v. City of Chicago. Adding
the NRA to the list of those arguing may seem unremarkable, but in
fact, the NRA has not been the pivotal player in the recent Supreme
Court litigation over the Second Amendment. That title goes to Gura,
something of an upstart, who took the landmark D.C. v. Heller case to
the high court in 2007. As we reported at the time, there were old
rivalries and no love lost between Gura and NRA lawyers, whom Gura
felt were obstacles, not allies in the litigation… So why did the
Court grant the motion? Clement is a familiar face at the Court, and
his presence may also represent a "cover all bases" strategy by
justices who favor incorporation but are uncertain how the privileges
or immunities argument will play out. Asked about the Court's decision
Clement said, "I think the grant of the NRA's motion may signal that
the Court is interested in ensuring that all the avenues to
incorporation, including the due process clause, are fully explored at
the argument." Clement added, "Of course, I look forward to working
with Alan." … (First, the NRA actually tried to sandbag Parker, the
case which became Heller, ostensibly out of fear that the time was not
ripe for such a big gamble. Second, many people fear that if McDonald
is won via the "due process" clause of the Fourteenth amendment,
instead of via the "privileges and immunity" clause, the power of the
federal judiciary will again be expanded.)

http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2010/01/nra-will-argue-in-second-amendment-case.html

…The lawyers for Otis McDonald and his co-plaintiffs are libertarian
activists, who are pushing an aggressive and potentially risky
constitutional theory to the Court. Without getting too much in the
legal weeds, McDonald is arguing that the Court should extend gun
rights to the states through the little-known Fourteenth Amendment
Privileges or Immunities Clause, and overrule a venerable precedent
from 1873 called the Slaughter-House Cases, which protects state
sovereignty by limiting the reach of Congress and the courts. The
Slaughter-House Cases is only one step removed from Marbury v. Madison
as one of the most important cases in American history… The problem is
that this approach could endanger gun rights. The narrower your focus
when arguing a case, the easier it is to get a court to go along with
you. The broader your argument, the steeper the hill you must climb…
For that reason, the National Rifle Association is working hard to
keep the focus of this case where it belongs, on gun rights. Whether
the Second Amendment gives 300 million Americans a right against state
or local laws that ban guns is a monumentally-important issue for
personal liberty, and so the NRA's argument presents only that issue
before the justices…

http://townhall.com/columnists/KenKlukowski/2010/01/25/mcdonald_gun-rights_case_round_one_goes_to_the_nra?page=full
---

Meanwhile, Back in DC…: The outstanding lawyer Alan Gura, who won the
case before the Supreme Court that struck down the ban on ownership of
firearms in the District of Columbia today argued our case for the
right, not only to "keep," but to "bear" arms, i.e., to carry them in
public. Alan's smart and focused and we've got a strong case. Cato
Chairman Robert A. Levy, who funded the previous case entirely out of
his own pocket, made the case for the right to carry in an article in
the Washington Post last year: "Gun Owners' Next Victory in D.C."
That's the same Robert A. Levy who wrote "The moral and constitutional
case for a right to gay marriage" for the New York Daily News earlier
this month. Bob is neither a gun owner nor gay; he's just a decent
person who believes in liberty and the rule of law. Oh, and he's
brilliant, too.

http://tomgpalmer.com/2010/01/23/our-case-for-the-right-to-bear-arms-argued-today/
---

Campus-Carry Movement under Attack: Special interests hostile to armed
citizens and self-defense are once again spreading tired lies about
Students for Concealed Carry on Campus and its mission. In press
releases published mainly by anti-gun websites and blogs, groups such
as the Campaign to Keep Guns Off Campus and the Brady Campaign claim
that all efforts to rescind defense-free zones on college campuses in
2009 failed. Echoing similarly loaded and inaccurate allegations made
earlier in the year, the notoriously anti-gun groups claimed failure
in every state that considered concealed carry on campus legislation,
calling such bills "dangerous," "radical" and "extremist." These
allegations come on the heels of legislation announced in three states
(Georgia, Arizona and Virginia) which would remove arbitrary bans of
concealed firearms on campus…

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/opponents-of-self-defense-recycle-old-lies
---

Colorado, South Dakota to Consider Firearms Freedom Acts: Introduced
in the State Senates of both Colorado and South Dakota last week is a
bill known as the "Firearms Freedom Act." If passed, the bill would
make state law that "any firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition
that is manufactured commercially or privately in the state and that
remains within the borders of the state is not subject to federal law
or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of
Congress to regulate interstate commerce." This now makes Firearms
Freedom Acts already passed in Montana and Tennessee, and currently
introduced in these 21 states: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado
Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New
Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota,
Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming. According to Gary
Marbut of the Montana Shooting Sports Association and author of the
original bill that was introduced in Montana, "It's likely that FFAs
will be introduced soon in West Virginia, New Mexico, Idaho, Kansas,
Arkansas, Louisiana, North Carolina and maybe elsewhere" South
Dakota's Senate Bill 89 (SB89) was introduced by State Senator Rhoden,
and has 22 Senate co-sponsors and 44 House co-sponsors. Colorado's
Senate Bill 092 (SB10-092) was introduced by State Senator Schultheis
and has 9 Senate co-sponsors and 7 House co-sponsors…

http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/01/colorado-south-dakota-firearms-freedom-act-introduced/

…The "Firearms Freedom Act" model legislation that is "sweeping the
nation" is merely political grandstanding and promises something that
none of the politicians supporting it are able to deliver. The promise
of the Firearms Freedom Act is that firearms manufactured entirely in
one state would be free from federal regulation.  The promise is
merely illusory, as the legislation will make no difference in Montana
or any other state that adopts it.  The United States Supreme Court
has already ruled that Congress has the power under the Commerce
Clause to regulate firearms manufactured in one state. In 2003, the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which sits in California, held that
the Commerce Clause did not permit Congress to regulate a machine gun
manufactured purely intrastate.  See U.S. v. Stewart.  This had the
result of making unregistered homemade machine guns legal in the Ninth
Circuit if there was no state law banning them.  The Supreme Court
vacated the opinion, however, and remanded to the Ninth Circuit to
re-evaluate its holding on the basis of Raich v. Gonzalez, which held
that medical marijuana grown for home use, with no intention to engage
in interstate commerce, was subject to Congress's power to regulate
interstate commerce.  On remand, the case was reversed, since if
Congress can ban homemade marijuana, there is no reason to believe
that Congress cannot ban a homemade machine gun… (I'm sure that there
were also those who questioned the value and import of the Boston Tea
Party. Whether or not the legislators who introduce these bills can
prevail against the federal Leviathan, the fact that they sense the
political value of introducing them says a lot.)

http://www.examiner.com/x-5619-Atlanta-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m1d23-Firearms-Freedom-Act-promises-something-politicians-are-not-able-to-deliver?cid=examiner-email
---

Washington Gun Owners Protest "AWB" Bill: Although the press corps is
already sounding Taps over Senate Bill 6396, which would ban the
future sale of so-called "assault weapons" and heavily regulate those
already in private possession, gun owners are planning a strong
turnout in Olympia Tuesday morning for a hearing on the measure.  They
want to "send a message" to the bill's sponsors – State Senators Adam
Kline (37th District), Jeanne Kohl-Welles (36th District), Darlene
Fairley (32nd District) and Joe McDermott (34th District) – and their
colleagues that banning guns in the Evergreen State is an idea that
simply will gain no traction among gun rights voters. Backers of the
bill have been practicing graveside politics to push the measure. The
slayings of five police officers – four at the Parkland massacre and
one in Seattle – and a Pierce County deputy sheriff have been fully
exploited by Washington CeaseFire and the Brady Campaign to Prevent
Gun Violence…

http://www.examiner.com/x-4525-Seattle-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m1d25-Press-sounding-Taps-over-Kline-legislation-hearing-turnout-could-cinch-bills-demise
---

New Hampshire Bill Would Repeal Gun Ban: The House Rules committee
today allowed Rep. Gene Chandler, R-Bartlett, to file a bill that
would repeal the weapons ban now in place at the State House. Earlier
this month the committee blocked Chandler's bill, which he proposed
after House deadlines had passed. At the time, a joint House-Senate
committee that controls uses of state buildings was considering a
second vote on the ban. Rules members said until that issue was
settled, and the ban was still subject to being overturned, it would
be premature to allow the introduction of the bill. On Jan. 15, the
Legislative Facilities Committee voted to keep the ban that it first
imposed last month. The ban reinstates a policy that was in force for
at least a decade, ending in 2006. It includes the Legislative Office
Building, connecting tunnels and the historic Upham Walker House…

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Bill+advances++to+repeal+weapons+ban+at+State+House&articleId=df4e8062-7901-4bc5-82b0-f401587f5c67
---

Meanwhile, in Texas…: Gov. Rick Perry said Friday that he's not for
increased security at the Texas Capitol after a shooting incident on
its south steps this week. Perry said that "the last thing I want is
the Texas Capitol to turn into DFW Airport," referring to security
checkpoints that have become familiar features of airport terminals.
Fausto Cardenas remained in Travis County's jail Friday, charged with
felony deadly conduct in the Thursday shooting. Witnesses said he
fired gunshots into the air and was reloading when state troopers
tackled him. Perry said enough people in Texas have concealed handgun
licenses to deter violent criminals. "That keeps us all safer," he
said. His comments came as he accepted the endorsement of the Texas
State Rifle Association and the National Rifle Association. Perry's in
a tough fight with U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison for the May 2
Republican nomination for governor.

http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local-beat/Perry-I-Dont-Want-Capitol-to-Be-Like-Airport-82445607.html

Contrary Editorial:

http://www.statesman.com/opinion/it-s-time-for-metal-detectors-at-the-195197.html
---

Crittenton Pleads Guilty to DC Gun Charge: Washington Wizards player
Javaris Crittenton pleaded guilty today to a misdemeanor for bringing
a handgun into the Verizon Center last month, prosecutors and
Crittenton's lawyer said. Senior Judge Bruce Beaudin of D.C. Superior
Court sentenced Crittenton, 22, to a year of unsupervised probation.
Crittenton will also have to perform community service with an NBA
program for Haiti and with a children's organization in Washington.
The charge - possession of an unregistered firearm - stems from an
argument Crittenton had with teammate Gilbert Arenas in December. This
month, Arenas pleaded guilty to a felony gun charge, and he's
scheduled to be sentenced in March…
http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2010/01/wizards-crittenton-pleads-to-gun-charge-lawyer-says.html

A Detailed Account:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/local/crime/Arenas-teammate-admits-to-taking-gun-for-showdown-82636397.html
---

Oops, Wrong Apartment: The Kern County [CA] Sheriff's Office has
determined that a deadly shooting Monday morning was self-defense. Two
men were shot at an apartment complex on the 2100 block of McCray
Street, according to a sheriff's office news release. Buck McKay, 29,
died, and an unidentified man is reportedly in critical condition at
Kern Medical Center. Deputies were called to the complex about 5 a.m.
There, they found McKay suffering from a single gunshot wound to the
head. He was taken to KMC, where he later died. The second man was
taken by private vehicle to Memorial Hospital and then taken to KMC.
Investigators determined that McCray and the other man came to the
apartments with a gun and "became involved in a disturbance with Jesse
Ash," according to the news release. Ash, 26, and Gregory Alexander,
28, were interviewed by detectives and released. The shooting is still
under investigation, but detectives believe Ash shot both men in
self-defense. The sheriff's office didn't specify what sparked the
confrontation.

http://www.bakersfieldnow.com/news/local/82607612.html
---

Oops, Wrong House, California Version: Police say a man opened fire on
two prowlers who broke into his Oxnard home, striking one of them
multiple times. Police say the man called 911 after seeing two
prowlers in his backyard Monday morning. Before police arrived, the
intruders had forced open a locked door leading into the home. The man
said he opened fire with a handgun when they ran toward him. Both
intruders then ran out of the house. Police say a 31-year-old man was
found lying in the driveway with multiple gunshot wounds. He was taken
to a hospital where he was listed in stable condition. Police say the
second intruder, who reportedly also had been shot, was seen running
from the neighborhood and remains at large.

http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_14268488?nclick_check=1
---

Oops, Wrong House, New York Version: A 52-year-old city man shot a
22-year-old man in the chest Wednesday evening, but police said he is
not expected to be charged after investigators learned he was likely
defending himself from a burglar. The younger man, Parrish C. Spencer
Jr., of Falls Street, broke the window of a side door and kicked in
the door about 5:30 p.m. to get inside the two-story home of Willie J.
Carson in the 500 block of 25th Street, police said. After Spencer got
inside and went upstairs, Carson shot him, police said. Spencer is in
stable condition today at Erie County [Medical Center. Investigators
found broken plexiglass at the scene. Captain Ernest C. Palmer, chief
of detectives, said Carson was not charged but the case has been
turned over to the Niagara County district attorney's office for
further investigation. Charges may be filed against Spencer, Palmer
added.

http://www.buffalonews.com/258/story/930442.html

Thursday, January 21, 2010

01-21-10

by permission from: Stephen P. Wenger
comments in () by the same
http://www.spw-duf.info


Paradigm Shift?: When I first started sharing news items via e-mail,
some recipients complained about receiving links to some of the
left-leaning news sites that required registration (e.g., N.Y. Times,
L.A. Times, etc.) As you may know, traditional print newspapers are in
financial trouble and will be shifting increasingly to an internet
model. Recently, The New York Times announced that it will begin
charging for access to much of its site. I suspect that this will
eventually become the new paradigm. My question is whether list
members want to receive links to articles that may require payment to
view. I myself am inclined to limit paid subscriptions to those news
sources that more closely reflect my own politics. At this time, I
have no idea how much it would cost me to subscribe to sites such as
The New York Times. Your input may help me decide when I am faced with
the actual decisions.
---

A Liberal Looks at McDonald: … In the city's attempt to preserve its
weapons ban, it proves too much, essentially urging the Supreme Court
to find that protection of the Bill of Rights and other fundamental
liberties against state infringement has no basis in constitutional
text or history, and is instead achieved solely by judicial
implication. To make matters worse, Chicago's brief makes common cause
with precedent that has been properly labeled by civil rights leaders
as "among the most misdirected in the history of the Court" and
celebrates a post-Civil War Court that looked the other way while Jim
Crow perpetuated decades of discrimination and violent rights
suppression. Accordingly, even gun-control advocates, who might
otherwise support the city's argument in this case, should think twice
about selling out substantive rights protection in order to protect
gun laws (especially when strong arguments, like those made by the
Brady Center and others, can be made in support of most gun
restrictions without undercutting the 14th Amendment)…

http://balkin.blogspot.com/2010/01/has-chicago-gone-too-far-in-defending.html
---

More on the Scott Brown Victory: The national political landscape has
been (apparently) shaken by Republican Scott Brown's improbable U.S.
Senate victory over Democrat Martha Coakley in Massachusetts. Amidst
the cheering and congratulations, we gun owners need to ask ourselves
what this means as far as our right to keep and bear arms is
concerned… I don't want to rain on everybody's parade, but I think gun
owners will be right at this point to breathe sigh of relief but keep
their enthusiasm in check. True, we dodged a bullet, no question. But
how will Senator Brown now handle our trust? The thing I noticed about
his victory speech last night that most raises my concern is this: "I
go to Washington as the representative of no faction or interest,
answering only to my conscience and to the people." Only?  Answer to
the Constitution, Mr. Senator-elect. If you do that, we'll get along
just fine… (Having made a small online contribution to the Brown
campaign, I was quite annoyed yesterday to receive two automated phone
calls from Brown telling me how grateful he is to John McCain for his
support and urging me to support McCain in his bid for re-election.
Politically aware Arizona gun owners have been trying to dump McCain
for years. As the saying goes, hope for the best but prepare for the
worst from this guy. I fear that using his victory speech to "tout"
his own daughters may be indicative of what we can expect.)

http://www.examiner.com/x-1417-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m1d20-What-does-Scott-Brown-victory-mean-for-gun-owners

Arizona Sen. John McCain has enlisted high-profile Republican support
in his bid for re-election, including the GOP's man of the hour,
Sen.-elect Scott Brown, R-Mass. Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin,
McCain's running mate in the 2008 presidential race who remains
popular among conservative voters, also is expected to lend a hand:
She visits Arizona on March 26-27 to help McCain raise money and
campaign… McCain is facing Republican challengers Chris Simcox and Jim
Deakin in this year's Aug. 24 primary. Former Republican Rep. J.D.
Hayworth, a conservative talk-show host on KFYI-AM (550), also may
challenge. In anticipation of a possible tough fight, McCain has been
burnishing his conservative credentials… (So far, I'm supporting
Deakin.)

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2010/01/21/20100121mccain0121.html
---

GOA Endorses Illinois Senate Candidate: Gun Owners of America
Political Victory Fund is pleased to endorse Patrick Hughes for U.S.
Senate in the February 2nd Illinois Republican primary. Patrick
Hughes' commitment to the right to keep and bear arms is unwavering.
Mr. Hughes understands that gun prohibitions turn law-abiding citizens
into easier targets for violent criminals.  Unlike his primary
opponent, Patrick Hughes does not support laws that treat people who
simply want to own a gun to protect their families like second class
citizens. The contrast between Patrick Hughes and his opponent could
not be clearer, as he is running against the most anti-gun Republican
in the U.S. House of Representatives… Mark Kirk has not only voted
consistently against your Second Amendment rights - he is an anti-gun
leader as well.  In 2004, Kirk urged then-Speaker of the House Dennis
Hastert to extend the Clinton ban on semi-automatic firearms.  After
its expiration, Kirk introduced his own bill to reinstate the gun ban.
In the current session of Congress, Kirk has cosponsored a bill that
will regulate gun shows out of existence and a bill to deny Second
Amendment rights to the hundreds of thousands of people on the
government's "watch" list… (As I recall, this is Big Brother's former
seat in the Senate.)

http://www.cdobs.com/archive/syndicated/gun-owners-of-america-endorse-hughes-for-u-s-senate,118649
---

Legalize Guns, Lower the Homicide Rate?: More guns in law-abiding
hands mean less crime. The District of Columbia proves the point.
Reading most press accounts, one would be forgiven for thinking
Armageddon had arrived after the Supreme Court struck down the
District's handgun ban in 2008. Predictions sprung forth from all
directions that allowing more citizens to own guns and not forcing
them to keep them locked up was going to threaten public safety.
According to D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty, more guns in homes would cause
more violent crime. This has never been the case. Local politicians
enthusiastically embraced the 1977 handgun ban predicting it would
make Washington a safe place by dramatically reducing murder rates.
But they were as wrong three decades ago as they are now. A telling
story is illustrated by the murder numbers since the handgun ban and
gun-lock bans were struck down. Between 2008 and 2009, the FBI's
preliminary numbers indicate that murders fell nationally by 10
percent and by about 8 percent in cities that have between 500,000 and
999,999 people. Washington's population is about 590,000. During that
same period of time, murders in the District fell by an astounding 25
percent, dropping from 186 to 140. The city only started allowing its
citizens to own handguns for defense again in late 2008… (I will agree
that the Heller decision, which increased the number of lawfully owned
handguns in DC and may have taken the locks off some of the long guns,
certainly did not increase the rate of violent crime. I continue to
remain cautious about crediting it with dropping the rate of criminal
homicides, particularly since it did not legalize carry outside the
home. Crime rates are influenced by many factors and I think it's
risky to base RKBA arguments on them.)

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jan/21/guns-decrease-murder-rates/
---

Green Eggs and Hamm: (After the controversy over the Austin gun show
situation, perhaps a bit of humor is necessary to lighten the mood.
Regarding the hot-button topic of gun control, the following satirical
poem is a whimsical take on the Brady Campaign agenda.) …

http://www.examiner.com/x-2879-Austin-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m1d21-Ode-to-the-Brady-Campaign
---

Ohio Restaurant-Carry Bill Heard in Committee: Yesterday, House Bill
203, the bill Ohioans For Concealed Carry drafted the initial version
of in conjunction with Representatives Danny Bubp and Jarrod Martin,
had proponent testimony before the Public Safety and Homeland Security
committee. This important fix would add restaurants to the current
exemption that covers class D retail stores provided the licensee is
not consuming alcohol… For those who don't know her, Nicole was being
terrorized by a stalker and obtained a Tennessee gun permit to carry a
firearm for protection. Unfortunately, it was while in a restaurant
that served alcohol that her stalker chose to strike. Nicole's gun was
locked in her car as mandated by Tennessee law just like Ohio's law
currently requires. She was helpless to stop the attacker as he shot
and killed her husband right in front of her. The testimony went very
well overall with Nicole's being called some of the most compelling,
relevant, and meaningful ever heard. We were very grateful to have her
there to speak. She serves as an example that this is not rhetoric and
that bans on self-defense while in a restaurant that happens to serve
alcohol can cost lives…

http://ohioccw.org/201001204764/restaurant-carry-hearing-recap.html
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-2206-Cleveland-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m1d20-Testifying-for-gun-rights-in-the-Ohio-legislature
---

Wyoming May Fix Reciprocity Blunder: Thumbs up to Senator Cale Case,
he has introduced legislation to fix the conceal-carry blunder from
earlier this year. SF 26 - Eligibility concealed weapons permit, will
fix what Freuedenthal's appointee decided was a problem. Ultimately,
WyGO / Wyoming Gun Owners supports legislation that lets anyone with a
permit from any state carry in Wyoming. If an individual has a
concealed carry permit from their own state, no matter what we
interpret from their state law, who are we to say they cannot carry in
Wyoming? Even if that state doesn't reciprocate, we must lead by
example. Also, can we say we should be able to carry anywhere in the
country only to restrict others visiting here? Certainly not…

http://www.examiner.com/x-25069-Cheyenne-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m1d18-Wyoming-Senator-Cale-Case-introducing-a-fix-to-conceal-carry-reciprocity
---

Colorado State University Carry Ban Advances: The Colorado State
University System has released a draft of a proposed policy that would
ban weapons from its Fort Collins and Pueblo campuses. The draft,
issued Wednesday, provides exemptions for certified law enforcement
officers, military personnel and ROTC drill teams. It also allows the
CSU police chief to grant exemptions for educational purposes and to
people who face a serious threat, if they have a concealed-carry
permit. It would allow the CSU police to store weapons for employees,
students and visitors. CSU officials said suggestions on the policy's
definitions, exemptions, storage plans and timelines will be accepted
through Jan. 29. The CSU System Board of Governors will consider the
final draft at a meeting in Pueblo in February. (If this policy is
adopted as drafted, I wonder if we will see protests in which the
capacity of the CSU police to store firearms for employees, students
and visitors will be overwhelmed.)

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/22283991/detail.html
---

Kids Need Firearms Training: When it comes to youth firearm training,
many Americans are fearful. Don't teach kids about guns, many urge.
Truth is that youth with guns get hurt because they don't know a thing
about them. In Western New York, thanks to the NRA's Eddie Eagle
program training in many elementary schools, children in grades one
through six are taught "If you find a gun, don't touch it, leave it
alone, call an adult!" Very effective! This 15-minute classroom
training is credited with saving hundreds of lives across the country
each year… There is help in the forecast. Thanks to NYS-DEC sponsored
youth hunting days in New York State and other states, trained and
safety-certified youngster numbers in the woods are increasing hunter
populations. It is a fact that young shooters and hunters have the
fewest number of safety related violations/incidents and firearm
accidents logged across the country. Kids today are keen on caution
when it comes to understanding danger and safety. Some older hunters
and non-hunting parents, need to learn about such facts and data! When
trained properly, youth do not violate the rules, not even close! They
know the law. They know about safety. They never shoot blind. They are
truly safe. High credits to these properly trained youth of today.
That's if you can get them interested! The big IF all needs to start
with the parents, so parents, it is up to you… (Eddie Eagle is a very
limited program. This was intended to reduce resistance to its use in
left-leaning schools, a tactic that has not proven particularly
effective. I'm glad to see that this article goes beyond Eddie Eagle.)

http://www.metrowny.com/cj_story.php?time_hash=6c76c947b53cba56cbe47e06929ccc17
---

NRA Taking Youth Education Summit Applications: The National Rifle
Association is currently accepting applications from qualified high
school sophomores and juniors to participate in the National Youth
Education Summit (Y.E.S.) from July 12-18, 2010. Over 40 outstanding
students from across the United States are chosen each year to travel
to the nation's capital, where they participate in the weeklong,
educational opportunity. The summit encourages young adults to become
active and knowledgeable U.S. citizens by learning about the
Constitution and Bill of Rights, the federal government, and the
importance of being active in civic affairs…

http://www.ammoland.com/2010/01/20/nra-youth-education-summit-applications/
---

Oops, Wrong Store: What happened inside a North Memphis [TN]
convenience store doesn't come as a surprise to most folks in the
area. In fact, they say the suspected crook got what he deserved…
Around eleven Sunday morning police say an armed, 17-year old boy
tried to rob Ben Call market. The robbery attempt failed when the
store manager pulled a gun and shot him. Nate Whitlock, a cab driver,
who frequently stops at Ben Call says you can never be too careful.
"You've got to do what you got to do. These people out here are
desperate," said Whitlock. The teen was taken to the med and is in
critical condition. The store owner didn't have anything to say about
what happened but Edward Howard did. "He didn't do nothing wrong he
was protecting his life and property." He says the area where the
shooting took place is plagued with crime and believes the store
manager's reaction was justified…

http://www.wreg.com/news/wreg-teen-shot-by-store-clerk,0,1499475.story
---

Rule Four Reminder: The 13-year-old son of Republican gubernatorial
candidate John Oxendine shot and wounded a 59-year-old man Sunday
while hunting on a North Georgia preserve owned by a prominent
insurance executive with close political ties to Oxendine. The victim
was hit with 30 pellets in his right leg. Oxendine, the state's
insurance commissioner since 1995, was hunting with his teenage sons
at the Northwest Georgia Quail Preserve, co-owned by Delos "Dee"
Yancey III, who is CEO of State Mutual Insurance Co., based in Rome.
"I still believe in hunting and I still believe in guns," Oxendine
said Wednesday. "I still will hunt and my family will still hunt." On
Tuesday, when the Atlanta Journal-Constitution first learned of the
shooting, Oxendine's staff said only that Oxendine himself was not the
shooter or the victim. Oxendine said Wednesday that he did not
identify his son as the shooter because he wasn't sure until the DNR
report came out. The report says four hunters fired at the same quail.
Oxendine was positioned near his son at the time of the shooting…
(Rule Four: Always be sure of your target and what's beyond it.
Hunting upland fowl such as quail requires very quick responses to
rapidly moving targets and becomes much trickier as the number of
hunters increases. This may not be too dissimilar from a gunfight,
which is why most instructors recommend ammunition which is not likely
to penetrate beyond the intended target.)

http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-politics-elections/oxendine-s-son-accidentally-279433.html
---

Warning Shots, Again: Gunfire erupted during a robbery in a
Northwestside beauty shop last night. No one was injured in the
exchange at Diana's Beauty Shop, 7011 N. Michigan Rd., but the robber
escaped with $340, according to an Indianapolis Metropolitan Police
Department report. Shop employee Hendry Rodriguez, 23, Indianapolis,
told police that a gunman entered the shop at 7 p.m. and demanded
money. Rodriguez gave the man about $30 from his pockets and opened
the cash register for him. The robber then told Rodriguez to go into a
backroom while he cleaned out the cash drawer. When Rodriguez reached
the rear of the shop he pulled out his own gun, a Glock with a 14
bullets in it, and fired a shot into the ground to scare the robber.
The bandit fired one shot at Rodriguez, missing him, and ran out the
front door, according to the report… (All's well that ends well but
Rodriguez could have gotten himself killed firing that warning shot.
If he lacked the justification to shoot the robber at that point, he
should not have fired at all.)

http://www.indystar.com/article/20100114/NEWS02/1140482/Guns-fired-during-beauty-shop-robbery
---

Some Cheese to Go with that Whine?: An Amtrak police officer is suing
the railroad, claiming it's liable for a woman who grabbed his gun and
shot him in the foot. Sixty-five-year-old James Bullard says he was
working at Philadelphia's 30th Street Station last March when he tried
to remove a disruptive woman from a McDonald's restaurant. He says she
grabbed his gun from his holster and shot him in the foot. In the
lawsuit, Bullard claims that he had a worn-out gun holster and that
Amtrak didn't provide a new holster when he requested one. Calls to
both Bullard and his attorney, Steven Lafferty, were not immediately
returned. An Amtrak spokesman declined to comment. (Rule Five:
Maintain control of your firearm. The integrity of your holster is
crucial to maintaining control of a handgun you carry. If it is
carried openly, the demand is higher, as is demonstrated in this
incident; I have always counseled that those who opt for open carry
need to use a holster with a minimum of one level of retention device.
Knowing that his holster was no longer meeting that requirement, this
officer's refusal to buy his own, after his employer failed to provide
him a new one, is reminiscent of deputies with whom I used to work who
argued, "if I needed that training, the department would give it to
me.")

http://townhall.com/news/us/2010/01/21/amtrak_cop_worn-out_holster_led_to_foot-shooting
---

Legitimizing "Evil Black Rifles": If Jim Zumbo had the National
Shooting Sports Foundation in his corner a few years ago, he might
still be the hunting editor of Outdoor Life magazine. Zumbo was
literally driven from the temple after expressing discouraging words
in his web site blog about the viability of so-called "black rifles"
or AR-15-style guns as hunting firearms. Unfortunately, Zumbo
expressed his opinions just at the time black rifles were gaining
traction in the shooting sports world, and his comments touched off a
firestorm of protests… It is to reduce the likelihood of such faux pas
that the NSSF announced here at the SHOT Show an ongoing effort to
educate shooting sports enthusiasts about black rifles,
euphemistically termed "modern sporting rifles" by the organization
and its members that manufacture the firearms. Hopefully, what such
traditionalists as Zumbo will learn from the project will rub off on
the general public, though the process of osmosis might be unclear at
this point…

http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/hunting/news/story?id=4843094
---

Colt Waffles on Double-Action Revolvers: … A Colt exec told me that
rumors of a new double action revolver from this fabled old company
are false…for now. He indicated, however, that both plans and
equipment are in place for this to happen, somewhere down the road.
My fellow gun writer Wiley Clapp was at the Colt booth, justifiably
proud that he had convinced the company to bring out a Series '70-type
Lightweight Commander .45, a popular model that hasn't been offered
since the early '80s… (I have maintained for years that a business
professor could offer at least a year's worth of courses on how not to
run a business using Colt as a case study. Almost everyone else in the
industry has realized the renewed demand for concealable revolvers as
lawful CCW increases across the nation. Many people would love to get
six .38 Special rounds in place of five in a small-frame revolver.
Colt already simplified the manufacture of its Detective Special by
converting to coil-spring versions: DS II, SF VI and Magnum Carry.)

http://backwoodshome.com/blogs/MassadAyoob/2010/01/20/shot-show-day-2/
---

Tangentially Related: The Supreme Court has ruled that corporations
may spend freely to support or oppose candidates for president and
Congress, easing decades-old limits on their participation in federal
campaigns. By a 5-4 vote, the court on Thursday overturned a
20-year-old ruling that said corporations can be prohibited from using
money from their general treasuries to pay for campaign ads. The
decision, which almost certainly will also allow labor unions to
participate more freely in campaigns, threatens similar limits imposed
by 24 states. The justices also struck down part of the landmark
McCain-Feingold [emphasis added] campaign finance bill that barred
union- and corporate-paid issue ads in the closing days of election
campaigns… The decision, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, removes
limits on independent expenditures that are not coordinated with
candidates' campaigns… The case also does not affect political action
committees, which mushroomed after post-Watergate laws set the first
limits on contributions by individuals to candidates. Corporations,
unions and others may create PACs to contribute directly to
candidates, but they must be funded with voluntary contributions from
employees, members and other individuals, not by corporate or union
treasuries.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/21/AR2010012101724.html
http://townhall.com/news/politics-elections/2010/01/21/supreme_court_rolls_back_campaign_spending_limits

…The chamber, as well as the GOP-aligned National Rifle Association
[emphasis added], filed briefs in the case supporting the conservative
non-profit group challenging the rules, though so did the American
Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations or
AFL-CIO. The Democratic National Committee, however, in a brief filed
by then-DNC general counsel Bob Bauer, who has since been tapped as
White House general counsel, argued in favor of keeping the rules,
asserting that opening the door to more corporate spending in
elections would discourage the types of small donors who he contends
helped power Obama to victory in 2008.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31786.html

…But the hundreds of comments the article received from readers - both
online and via e-mail - included surprises. Seems lots of people share
names with people suspected of being terrorists. My personal favorite
came from readers who pointed out that they have top-secret security
clearance. Yet they still cannot get through an airport without a
struggle… (Recall that there are those who would deny lawful firearm
purchases to those whose names appear on no-fly lists.)

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/mikey-youre-not-alone/

--

Monday, January 18, 2010

01-18-10

By permission from Stephen P. Wenger
comments in () by the same
http://www.spw-duf.info

The Fort Hood Cover-Up: In their new report on the Fort Hood army base
tragedy, the Department of Defense (DoD) may have intended to provide
the public with an explanation about what happened and how to ensure
it never happens again. The report does indeed highlight the situation
quite clearly, and explains what we can expect in the future, just not
as intended… All the public hand-wringing and finger pointing is
designed to obfuscate the fact that the DoD plans to implement no
workable defense against future attacks like Fort Hood. From page 32:
"The Department of Defense does not have a policy governing privately
owned weapons." Recommendation? "Review the need for DoD privately
owned weapons policy." The magic answer: More gun control!
This is a curious response, considering that gun control was the
reason so many people died at Fort Hood. Their policy is obvious and
unchanged: The DoD requires enlisted staff to swear an oath to protect
and uphold the Constitution, but the DoD itself claims exemption.
Furthermore, the DoD expects enlisted staff to support
anti-Constitutional behavior by following and enforcing their
disarmament policy… (I believe that the remarks about enlisted staff
apply equally to commissioned and warrant officers.)

http://www.examiner.com/x-2879-Austin-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m1d18-Fort-Hood-report-More-questions-than-answers

Then There's the Other Aspect…: Fear of offending Muslims or being
insensitive to religion was likely a key factor to why Army
supervisors missed signs that the suspect in the deadly Fort Hood
shooting rampage was a Muslim extremist, according to national
security experts… Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, a former military medical doctor,
said political correctness is a major problem for the military and the
government as a whole in dealing with Islamism. "The culture in the
military and the U.S. government is that you just don't touch
religion," said Dr. Jasser, president of the Phoenix-based American
Islamic Forum for Democracy. As a result, the military is ill-equipped
to deal with the threat posed by radicalized Muslims, he said in an
interview… Dr. Jasser said he fears that the Army will use several
officers as Fort Hood "scapegoats" although they were never provided
the training and directives needed to identify those prone to
conducting terrorist attacks… (I think there is a difference between
missing signs and overlooking them for reasons of political
correctness.)

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jan/18/muslim-question-persists-in-army-shooting/
---

The Rest of Illinois Also Awaits McDonald Outcome: …The Chicago area's
Democrats and the Springfield politicians who support them long have
kept gun-rights laws from advancing in the Legislature. State Rep.
Mike Tryon said that even when gun-rights bills – such as those
advocating concealed carry – had been proposed, they seldom made it to
the House or Senate floors. "We always have a concealed-carry bill.
It's just it never really gets a fair chance and a fair debate," said
Tryon, R-Crystal Lake. "If you can't get bills called for a good
debate and you can't get them called on the House floor for a vote,
they never pass." For Illinoisans, that means gun rights isn't just a
partisan issue – it's geographic. Consider the Pro Second Amendment
Resolution, which the McHenry County Board adopted with unanimous
support in April 2008. Ninety counties in the state joined McHenry
County in opposing the passage of any bills that would put limits on
the right to bear arms, according to the Illinois Pro Second Amendment
Resolution Web site. The resolution failed in Lake County, and
lingered at "undecided" in Cook, DuPage and DeKalb counties. The
resolution passed in almost every other county… (There are 102
counties in Illinois. Chicago is located in Cook County, which
encircles DuPage County on two sides; DeKalb is the second county west
of Cook.)

http://www.nwherald.com/articles/2010/01/15/r_jzimt4awqusipmdl3xgyuw/index.xml
---

Pennsylvania Cities Ignore State Preemption: A number of
municipalities throughout Pennsylvania have enacted, or are
considering enacting, ordinances known popularly as "Lost or Stolen"
that impose a duty to report lost or stolen firearms within a
prescribed time period and set penalties for failure to make a report.
The justification for these ordinances is that they will somehow
restrict the flow of "illegal" firearms into their municipalities
and/or restrict straw-purchases. When asked how these ordinances will
work, one is met with a "deer in the headlights" stare. The
municipalities involved are being lobbied by gun-control
organizations, at least two attorneys, at least two PA legislators and
are being advised – at least in some cases - by their respective
solicitors to proceed with enacting such ordinances…

http://www.examiner.com/x-35389-Pittsburgh-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m1d11-Preemption-local-jurisdictions-ignoring-the-law
---

NRA AWOL in New Hampshire?: …Nappen tells me in correspondence: "The
NRA failed to show up for a gun ban bill hearing in NH... This bill
bans carrying of muzzleloading firearms, including ML handguns in
vehicles, (which BTW is currently legal and may be done without a
carry license.) The motor vehicle law has caused prosecutions of
target shooters (State v. Shaw), is a threat to modern handgun carry,
and the bill presented a golden opportunity to legalize carrying of
loaded rifles, shotguns in vehicles." I'd like to extend the benefit
of the doubt. Often times, sensitive discussions take place behind
closed doors and out of the public eye by those with access to
legislators. As much as I might demand otherwise for open government
(because, after all, nothing is being discussed that doesn't affect
the rest of us), I do realize this happens and we'll never be privy to
every deal…

http://www.examiner.com/x-1417-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m1d16-Where-is-NRA-on-New-Hampshire-gun-bill
---

Georgia Sheriff Supports RKBA Bill: Oconee County Sheriff Scott Berry
doesn't know if someone breaks the law just by carrying a concealed
firearm while talking with friends outside a convenience store. That's
because current state law that forbids people with concealed weapons
permits from bringing those weapons to public gatherings is too fuzzy,
Berry said. "There's no clear definition of what a public gathering
is, and the truth is. we're not going to enforce a law that is so
poorly written," he said. "It's a serious matter to take someone into
custody on the basis of something that is unclear and poorly written."
Berry is among those who support proposed legislation that would
expand gun-owners' rights, allowing those with proper permits to bring
concealed weapons anywhere from bars to university classrooms to
church sanctuaries. "As it should be, property owner rights trump all
other rights," Berry said. "Maybe your church wants to ban (concealed
weapons) or not, but can't that be an individual decision for the
people in Georgia to make rather than the legislature? If the
University of Georgia wants to ban firearms, I don't think it needs a
state law to do that." … (Recall that the earliest "gun control" laws
were intended to deny blacks the RKBA. As a result, ambiguity was
often intentional, to facilitate selective enforcement,)

http://www.onlineathens.com/stories/011710/gen_550617756.shtml
---

No Surprise Here: As it did last year when a similar bill was
introduced, the New Mexico Restaurant Association has expressed its
opposition to allowing concealed guns in restaurants that serve beer
and wine. As Executive Director Carol Wight wrote today in The
Independent Forum: "What if a customer comes into a restaurant with a
bulge at their waistline… How do we know it's not a gun? How do we
know they have a license? Do we ask? If they don't have a license
doesn't that put the server in a VERY awkward position? If they do
have a license, are we required to check it? We have been told that
the concealed carry permit does not allow a person to drink on
premise.  How do we enforce that law? Do we need yet more server
training to enforce the gun laws in New Mexico?" (The answer to this
question is "no." If business owners take responsibility for their own
decisions to disarm their customers, instead of asking the state to do
it for them, they need only enforce their own policies, not state
law.)

http://newmexicoindependent.com/44535/nm-restaurant-association-opposes-concealed-gun-bill
---

Reporter Attends CHL Course: Ed Strickland spends his days surrounded
by guns. While the career lawman and avid hunter might have one of the
best-guarded homes in Abbeville, the claim to fame he's particularly
fond of is his 10-year role as a concealed weapons permit course
instructor - a $65 "public service" he provides for about 20 residents
from throughout South Carolina each month. Strickland's class Saturday
attracted 19 people - 14 men and five women - of varying races and
ages. Some were in their 20s, while others were well into retirement.
Several identified themselves as victims of crimes, while some said
they wanted to avoid becoming one. One man said he was drawn to take
the course after he was shot during a home invasion and another said
he'd be one of the few people in his "rough" Greenwood neighborhood to
carry a gun legally… Aside from basic firearm safety, the main goal of
the concealed weapons permit course is to make sure students know how
to work their gun and can carry it safely, securely and concealed.
Strickland discussed the components of a gun and their functions
before moving on to holsters…

http://www.indexjournal.com/articles/2010/01/11/news/b0112%20account.txt
---

California Student Gains National Attention: Gary Tudesko never
thought an early-morning duck hunt before school could turn into a
potentially explosive legal battle involving the Fourth Amendment, the
California Code of Education and federal "Gun-Free School Zone" laws.
But when the 17-year-old junior at Willows High School in rural
northern California stowed his and a friend's unloaded shotguns on the
back seat of his Chevy Silverado and went to class on the morning of
Oct. 26, it set off a chain of events that led first to Tudesko's
suspension from school, and, at the end of November, his expulsion by
the school district for violations of California Code of Education
mandates against possession of firearms on school property. Except
that Tudesko's truck wasn't parked on school property that morning,
and he never possessed a firearm on grounds belonging to the Willows
Unified School District…

http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/hunting/news/story?id=4832232
---

Good Commentary from California: …As I started to write this piece, I
realized that during the past 230 years, words and definitions have
mutated into something that would be unrecognizable to our founding
fathers. Brilliant though they were, they could not predict how future
generations would define certain words and concepts. Where we use word
de jure slogans, the framers wrote in terms of underlying human
experience. If James Madison had lived today and realized that
nefarious elements in this country were challenging the right of
Americans to bear arms, he probably would have written something like,
"All citizens have the right to own semi-automatic guns, rifles and
ammunition - period." But he didn't, because that is not how the
framers thought - or wrote. Remember that when you're reading the
historic words that provide the foundation of this great country…
(Those who seek a more detailed understanding of what the Founders
meant are advised to read Stephen Halbrook's The Founders' Second
Amendment.)

http://www.noozhawk.com/local_news/article/011710_daniel_petry_we_must_protect_americans_right_to_bear_arms/
---

Oops, Wrong House, Version 1: Police are searching for suspects after
a homeowner apparently shot an intruder who was trying to break into
his home. The Sacramento [CA] Police Department said one or two
suspects are still at large after the incident on the 7800 block of
Ann Arbor Way on Sunday evening. Two or three suspects hopped over a
back fence at about 8:30 p.m. and attempted to break into a home,
according to authorities, and a grandfather inside heard the commotion
and grabbed a firearm. He shot one of the suspects, according to
police. The injured suspect is expected to survive. None of the home
occupants were injured.

http://cbs13.com/local/sacramento.home.shooting.2.1432585.html
---

Oops, Wrong House, Version 2: A man in a ski mask was shot by a
resident after he forced his way into an Indio [CA] home Saturday
night, police said. The suspect fled the home with a gunshot wound,
the weapon and an undisclosed amount of money after he confronted the
residents, a couple in their "60's or 70s," Indio Police spokesman Ben
Guitron said. The couple was transported to a hospital with minor
injuries… The suspect allegedly entered the backyard through a side
gate and smashed the rear glass sliding door, Guitron said. The
suspect ordered the residents to lie down on the floor, began
searching the residence, then scuffled with the husband, Guitron said.
During the scuffle, the wife obtained a 38-caliber handgun and shot
the suspect once in the upper torso, according to evidence the police
gathered, Guitron said. The suspect disarmed the wife and was
encountered by a neighbor who heard the commotion, Guitron said. The
suspect fled in a waiting vehicle, described as a red Ford Mustang
with a black top. A partial plate of 5PA was reported, Guitron said…
(While this is a very rare case in which a private citizen was
disarmed by an assailant, we can give thanks that the gun was not used
against the couple.)

http://www.mydesert.com/article/20100118/NEWS0801/1180313/Retired+couple+defend+home+against+burglary
---

Is This What's Wrong with So Many New Guns?: …Get a workable product
out the door and fix the bugs as you go along. That way you also get
valuable feedback about its strengths and weaknesses, for the market
doesn't likely agree with you about what's perfect… (This is from an
advice article for budding entrepreneurs but if this philosophy is
functioning in the firearm industry, that's downright scary.)

http://www.forbes.com/2010/01/07/new-business-mistakes-leadership-managing-innovation.html

Friday, January 15, 2010

01-15-10

by permission from-Stephen P. Wenger
comments in () by the same
http://www.spw-duf.info

GOA's State of the Union on the RKBA: By the end of the month,
President Barack Obama is expected to give the State of the Union
address.  Oh, what a year it's been.  It was almost a year ago that
President Obama took his oath of office.  But soon after he raised his
right hand and promised to "preserve, protect and defend" the
Constitution, Americans became engaged in the fight of their lives to
safeguard their liberties.  The extremist Obama administration began
pushing an anti-gun, socialistic agenda of the kind that most
Americans have not seen in their lifetimes. The President began
placing gun-hating radicals in high positions of power - both in the
executive department and in the courts - and he pushed a socialistic
gun control agenda that kept gun owners busy throughout 2009.  Yet
through it all, Gun Owners of America rallied the troops to oppose the
President each and every step of the way.  Some battles we lost.
Others we won.  Some are still at a stalemate.  Regardless, this 2009
review should encourage you.  It shows that even though every
institution in Washington is slanted against us, we can slow down,
stop or reverse the march towards gun control…

http://gunowners.org/a011410.htm
---

But the Real Culprit Was the Gun Ban: A Pentagon inquiry into the case
of the alleged Fort Hood shooter could lead to punishment of up to
eight Army officers, a U.S. official said late Thursday. Defense
Secretary Robert Gates was expected to refer findings on the officers
to the Army for further inquiry and possible punishment. The report on
what went wrong in the case of Army Maj. Nidal Hasan, who is accused
in the shootings, is expected to be released Friday. The official said
a Pentagon inquiry finds fault with five to eight supervisors who knew
or should have known about the shortcomings and erratic behavior of
the shooting suspect. Hasan is accused of killing 13 people at the
Texas Army base on Nov. 5. The officers supervised Hasan when he was a
medical student and during his early work as an Army psychiatrist at
Walter Reed Army Medical Center… (Rest assured that rather than even
criticize those responsible for maintaining defenseless-victim zones
at Ft. Hood and other military bases, such policies will only be
intensified.)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/15/AR2010011500038.html?hpid=sec-nation
---

NRA Plugs Brown in Crucial Senate Race: The National Rifle Association
became the latest group to enter the Massachusetts senate race this
week, spending a bit under $20,000 to mail four-color postcards to Bay
State voters, according to a filing with the Federal Election
Commission. The mailing is, not surprisingly, on behalf of Republican
Scott Brown. In the last few days the race to replace the late Sen.
Ted Kennedy has become a magnet for political dollars from national
groups who see the contest as being about the filibuster-breaking 60th
Democratic senate vote and the fate of healthcare reform. Indeed, the
NRA's $20,000 foray is fairly low-key compared to other sums that have
been spent, mostly on television ads. According to the Washington
Post's Chris Cillizza, the heavy hitters include the Democratic
Senatorial Campaign Committee with almost $1 million, the Service
Employees International Union with $529,000, and a labor-backed 527
called Citizens for Strength and Security plunking down $278,000 all
supporting Coakley. Brown's allies include the Chamber of Commerce,
with $443,000, the American Future Fund with $375,000 and Americans
for Responsible Health Care with $204,000. Cillizza reports that
overall Coakley's allies are outspending Brown's by 2-1. Add the NRA's
drop into Brown's bucket. Interestingly, the National Republican
Senatorial Campaign still doesn't seem to have sunk any cash into the
race. (This race could cost the Democrats their 60-seat guarantee in
the Senate.)

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/robert-schlesinger/2010/01/14/nra-fires-off-mailing-for-scott-brown.html
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjM4NDE3MGJiNDI0Y2Q1OTJkNWYxNmM1Y2ZiYzU4Mjk=
---

F Troop Record Errors, Part 2: Yesterday we looked at a real-world
example illustrating both the inaccuracy of the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives' National Firearms Registration and
Transfer Record (NFRTR) as well as explored potential dangers gun
owners could face as a result. Today we're going to document the
probability that this was not just an isolated case, but an indication
of system-wide incompetence, negligence, deception and cover-up that
reaches throughout and beyond the agency, extending to those charged
with providing audit oversight. We've also talked about the Friesen
case. CliffsNotes version: The feds had a man on a machine gun charge
that could have resulted in a felony conviction if found guilty - but
they folded after it became clear the integrity of the NFRTR would be
exposed and their ability to rely on it in future cases would be
jeopardized…

http://www.examiner.com/x-1417-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m1d14-Have-officials-willfully-conspired-to-cover-up-ATF-record-errors
---

When Governments Ignore the Law?: When individual citizens ignore the
law and carry on as they please, they can be prosecuted in civil or
criminal courts, to punish their behavior. But what happens when
government ignores the law because elected officials have a
philosophical disagreement with the letter and the spirit of said law?
What are the citizens to do? … The same disregard for law has now been
exhibited by four Democrats (remember which political party they
represent; an old Bob Hope film clip sums up hilariously how a growing
number of people, especially gun owners, look at Democrats as zombies)
on the Snohomish County Council, according to angry gun owners.
Republican Councilman John Koister, who declared that he is now
running for Congress against Democrat incumbent Rick Larsen in the 2nd
District, had implored his colleagues to amend a 1971 ordinance
banning guns in county parks. That ban was clearly voided by the 1983
state statute, RCW 9.41.290. I discussed the issue here on Tuesday,
but just in case Koster's colleagues are still not clear, here's what
the statute says in plain English: Local laws and ordinances that are
inconsistent with, more restrictive than, or exceed the requirements
of state law shall not be enacted and are preempted and repealed,
regardless of the nature of the code, charter, or home rule status of
such city, town, county, or municipality. There is not a lot of wiggle
room here…

http://www.examiner.com/x-4525-Seattle-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m1d14-What-happens-when-governments-ignore-the-law
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20100114/NEWS01/701149939
---

Georgia RKBA Bills Subjected to the Usual Attacks: Jeff Wilburn of
Marietta is not a fan of Rep. Tim Bearden's bill, HB 615, or Sen.
Mitch Seabuagh's bill, SB 308, either of which would repeal Georgia's
unique public gathering law.  In a pair of editorials today in the
Atlanta Journal Constitution, Tim Bearden writes a defense of why he
believes HB 615 is necessary, and Jeff Wilburn writes an article
opposing any reform of Georgia law.  Mr. Wilburn writes, "Left
unchecked, these lawmakers will take us back to the wild west days of
shootouts at the OK Corral. Their desire is to appease gun
manufacturers, whose profits are the root cause of this push, and
their lobbyist arm, the NRA, rather than the majority of Georgia
citizens." Overlooking for now that the shootout at the OK Corral was
actually the result of overly aggressive enforcement by police
officers of a strict gun control law in Tombstone, Arizona, is Mr.
Wilburn's hysterical prediction of "wild west days of shootouts"
worthy of serious consideration in the debate over these two bills?
Opponents of decriminalizing handgun carry in restaurants that serve
alcohol and state parks made similar predictions in 2008 that failed
to materialize.  Opponents of decriminalizing handgun carry in the
crowded confines of MARTA trains fought vigorously against a perceived
danger of "vigilantism" and shootouts, even calling for bullet-proof
shields to protect drivers, but they have grown conspicuously silent
as murder and robbery rates actually declined in the wake of the new
law and no reported misuses of firearms by lawful carriers have
occurred…

http://www.examiner.com/x-5619-Atlanta-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m1d14-Will-HB-615-result-in-shootouts-at-the-OK-Corral?cid=exrss-Atlanta-Gun-Rights-Examiner
---

Ohio Restaurant-Carry Hearing Next Week: House Bill 203, which seeks
to "allow a concealed carry licensee who is not consuming liquor and
is not under the influence to carry a concealed handgun in a retail
food establishment or food service operation with any class liquor
permit issued for the location," has been added to the House Committee
on Public Safety and Homeland Security agenda for sponsor testimony
today, Tuesday, January 19 at 3:00pm in Statehouse Hearing Room 122.
The purpose for Tuesday's hearing is so that the committee may hear
testimony on HB203 from the legislation's supporters. Buckeye Firearms
Association will offer testimony in support of this legislation…

http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/7073
---

Oklahoma Firearms Freedom Act Proposed: To strengthen the Second
Amendment rights of Oklahomans, state Rep. Lewis Moore has filed
legislation to deter frivolous lawsuits against gun manufacturers. "In
recent years gun-control fanatics have used litigation to indirectly
undermine our constitutional rights. By filing frivolous lawsuits
against gun manufacturers, they have attempted to put those companies
out of business and, for all intents and purposes, block access to
firearms and gut the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution," Moore
said. "My legislation will prevent fanatics from abusing our courts in
that fashion and protect the fundamental constitutional rights of
working Oklahomans." House Bill 2884, creates the "Oklahoma Firearms
Freedom Act," which declares that a "personal firearm, a firearm
accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or
privately in Oklahoma and that remains within the borders of Oklahoma
is not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including
registration, under the authority of Congress to regulate interstate
commerce." … (This is the first of the firearms-freedom acts I have
seen touted as a means to deter frivolous lawsuits. In fact, federal
law already bars them.)

http://www.koco.com/mostpopular/22242797/detail.html
---

Indiana Confidentiality Bill Advances: A House committee unanimously
voted today to keep secret information about people who have permits
to carry a handgun. House Bill 1068, authored by Rep. Peggy Welch,
D-Bloomington, is aimed at newspapers, including The Indianapolis
Star, which has published stories and databases based on gun permit
information. The Indianapolis Star database does not identify gun
owners by name or address, but instead lets people search for
demographic information on gun permits by zip code. The Star used
information gleaned from the permits for stories published in October
which found that people with violent histories had been given gun
permits, in some cases over the objections of local police… The bill
would allow general information about gun permits to be released for
journalistic and academic research, but would bar the release of
names, addresses and other personal information which had allowed The
Star to identify people whom police felt should not have gun permits.
The bill now goes to the full House for debate. The House Natural
Resources Committee also heard testimony on a bill which would require
companies to let people bring guns to work, so long as they were kept
in a locked vehicle. A vote was delayed on that bill, in order for the
committee to work on possible amendments to placate businesses. The
Indiana Chamber of Commerce and the Indiana Manufacturers Association
both opposed the bill, saying it deprived businesses of their right to
decide whether weapons should be on their personal property…

http://www.indystar.com/article/20100114/NEWS05/1140494
---

Arenas Charged with Felony: Washington Wizards guard Gilbert Arenas
was charged Thursday with felony gun possession in connection with a
Dec. 21 locker room confrontation with a teammate. Prosecutors charged
Mr. Arenas with one count of carrying a pistol without a license,
which carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison. The charges
were filed in D.C. Superior Court in an information, a document that
often signals a plea deal…

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jan/15/wizards-arenas-charged-felony/

Gilbert Arenas was charged Thursday with a single count of carrying a
pistol without a license, a felony that carries a five-year sentence,
but the Washington Wizards guard has reached a plea agreement that
could result in much less or even no jail time, several  sources close
to the case said. Arenas is scheduled to plead guilty Friday afternoon
before D.C. Superior Court Judge Robert E. Morin, who must decide
Arenas's sentence… Two witnesses told The Washington Post that
Crittenton then pulled his own gun, loaded it and cocked it. He never
pointed it at anyone, the witnesses said, and the situation soon
calmed down. And just hours before the charges against Arenas were
filed on Thursday, Arlington and D.C. police searched Crittenton's
home looking for the gun, according to sources familiar with the
investigation and court papers… Defense attorneys who have battled
District prosecutors on behalf of clients who had similar gun
possession charges are watching the case closely to see if Arenas
receives any special treatment. "It's rare prosecutors allow
defendants to plead down," said attorney Nikki Lotze… (It would appear
that a similar case is being built against Crittenton.)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/14/AR2010011403502.html?hpid=topnews
---

DC Democrat Admits to Illegal Firearm Possession: … Johnson explains
his vote this way: The Democratic State Committee, last year, approved
another resolution, expressing the sense of the committee that the
District shouldn't accept a vote in the House of Representative if
that meant, as it did at the time, allowing Congress to wipe out city
gun laws. The way Johnson sees it, the DCDSC has its chance to ask for
voting rights, and they blew it… Johnson also informed LL that he in
fact owns a gun, which he keeps in his home - "and I take it out with
me, too." He purchased his piece legally from a gun dealer, but he
hasn't registered that weapon with the Metropolitan Police Department,
as he's required to do under the city's current gun laws (as Gilbert
Arenas now well knows). "It's no big deal with me, owning a gun or not
owning a gun," Johnson says, saying he "doesn't understand" why he
needs to take his firearm down to police headquarters and go through
all the legal rigmarole. "I'm not going to register mine."

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2010/01/14/local-democrat-explains-vote-against-voting-rights-admits-illegal-gun-possession/
---

"Police Generally Advise Cooperation…": A 63-year-old convicted
murderer from Roslindale [MA] is facing charges that he killed again -
fatally shooting a Jamaica Plain convenience store clerk in a robbery
on the day after Christmas, even though the clerk had compiled with
his demands… In June 1973, when he was 27 years old, Corliss was
convicted of killing a 61-year-old store clerk in Salisbury, according
to court records and news clippings of that time. Corliss shot George
W. Oakes on Nov. 6, 1971 during a robbery attempt at Dot's Variety
Store, which Oakes ran with his wife, Doris. Corliss was sentenced to
life in prison for second-degree murder but was paroled in 1991. He
was taken back into custody three months after his release. In May
2006, the parole board voted 5-1 to allow him to be released to Bridge
House, a long-term residential program… Police said Dangol appeared
calm and offered no resistance during the robbery, never making any
sudden moves, according to surveillance camera footage. Authorities
said the crime was shocking because Dangol had done everything right
and was gunned down in cold blood for a small stack of bills…

http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/01/suspect_faces_c_1.html
---

Life in California: On January 9, 2009, Phillip Dominguez drove into
Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), as he has done many times
before, to pick up a friend at the airport before they went straight
from the airport to a local shooting range. Due to a random stop his
car was searched and he was arrested when firearms were found in his
truck. Mr. Dominguez' truck was pulled over as part of a random search
of vehicles entering the airport by airport security police . Officers
discovered 16 firearms and just over a thousand of rounds of
ammunition, which Mr. Dominguez had planned to use at the range with
his friend later that day. Amongst the firearms the officers found was
a lawfully registered "assault weapon" with the registration paperwork
attached to the stock of the firearm. Nonetheless, police took Mr.
Dominguez' truck to the local airport police station and conducted a
more thorough search of the truck. Among other things, officers then
found a Springfield Armory M1A Socom with a grip-pod (exhibit 1), a
Kel-Tec SU-16 (alleged be an "assault weapon" with a "flash
suppressor" which actually was a muzzle brake) (exhibit 2), and a
Spike's Tactical model ST22 (alleged to be an AR "type" "assault
weapon," despite the firearm being rimfire) (exhibit 3). All of the
other firearms were locked in their containers except for a handgun
allegedly secreted in the truck's center console between the truck's
front seat, along with two speed loaders… During the months following
the arrest attorneys from Michel and Associates P.C. worked with the
District Attorney's Office to resolve the case, pointing out multiple
errors in the legal designations by and opinions of the LAPD officers,
as well as mitigating factors that worked in Mr. Dominguez' favor.
These mitigating factors included Mr. Dominguez' lack of malicious
intent in possessing the firearms and original intent of taking the
firearms to a gun range when entering LAX to pick up his friend.
Ultimately Mr. Dominguez pled to a misdemeanor violation of possession
of a concealed firearm and received three years informal probation.
His right to possess firearms was not restricted…

http://www.calgunlaws.com/images/stories/Docs/victorylist2010/153497_1.pdf
---

Why We Prepare: Aid groups in Port-au-Prince said the relief effort
could be hampered by the deteriorating security situation as criminals
and desperate locals fought for the scarce resources… Inmates escaped
from the damaged main prison in Port au Prince on Tuesday when it
collapsed in the earthquake. Thieves were blamed for starting at least
one mass panic in the city's central square during the night,
spreading rumours that a tidal wave was coming so they could steal the
belongings left behind by hundreds of fleeing people… "All the
policemen are busy rescuing and burying their own families," said tile
factory owner Manuel Deheusch. "They don't have the time to patrol the
streets." With law enforcement stretched thin even before the
earthquake and the UN's 9,000 peacekeepers distracted by the collapse
of their headquarters and the loss of up to 100 staff, the country is
ill-equipped to deal with major unrest… Valmir Fachini, a spokesman
for the Brazilian charity Viva Rio charity, said he had not seen a
single UN peacekeepers on security patrol. "Unfortunately we aren't
seeing [peacekeepers] in the streets," he said. "We are hearing
several gunshots without knowing where they are coming from exactly.
Looting has started in the supermarkets, which have partly fallen
down," he said. "What is happening is that, if food doesn't arrive,
eventually the people will start looting houses. The gunshots are
constant and we have the impression that its families trying to
protect themselves from attackers." … (Police too busy taking care of
themselves and their families? It sounds like post-Katrina New
Orleans.)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/centralamericaandthecaribbean/haiti/6990801/Haiti-earthquake-law-and-order-breaks-down.html

… What made the situation that much more tense was sightings of gangs
of young men with machetes. On Wednesday they were seen getting into
stores and taking all the supplies they could carry. The armed men
were seen marching up and down the streets with machetes raised and
the competition among the gangs turned quite fierce. Fights between
gangs were seen on the streets. Machetes were flailing and it was
impossible to predict what would happen next. There was no sign of
police or any kind of law and order…

http://wcbstv.com/national/haiti.earthquake.haiti.2.1427143.html

Tangentially Related: … It's easy to blame poverty for the magnitude
of the devastation in Haiti this week, but poverty is the result of
poor governance. The island of Hispaniola provides a useful
comparative laboratory in this regard, like the Korean Peninsula or
the two Germanys during the Cold War. Haiti is on the western side of
the island, and the eastern two-thirds make up the Dominican Republic,
a functioning democracy with a relatively strong economy. The 2008 per
capita income in the Dominican Republic was $8,200, making it 119th in
the world. In Haiti, income was $1,300, ranking 203rd, the lowest in
the Western Hemisphere. Satellite images of the island clearly show
the divide between the two countries because of deforestation and a
lackluster agricultural sector on the Haitian side…

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jan/15/haitis-voodoo-regime/
---

Failure to Stop as a Legal Defense?: A Washington County [PA]
hairstylist who claims she didn't know a .38-caliber handgun was a
"deadly weapon" will spend five to 20 years in prison for shooting a
dissatisfied client in the lower back. Forty-year-old Monique Reed, of
Washington, was convicted in May on aggravated assault and other
charges in the March 6, 2008, shooting of 28-year-old Lauren Newton.
Police say Ms. Reed shot Ms. Newton when she scuffled with the
customer and her sister about a hair weave Ms. Reed did for Ms.
Newton. Ms. Newton has recovered from her wound. Ms. Reed says she
fired two shots because the Ms. Newton sisters jumped her and didn't
realize "a .38-caliber could be considered a deadly weapon." Ms. Reed
told the judge who sentenced her yesterday, "That .38-caliber didn't
even take her down."

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10013/1027885-100.stm
---

We Call That a Clue: A 65-year-old man apparently drove through the
Cleveland [OH]  suburbs and randomly shot at moving cars several times
over the span of four months, authorities said Friday in announcing
his arrest. Paul Hausmann is suspected of shooting at four vehicles in
Berea and a fifth in Strongsville, his hometown, between mid-August
and mid-December, Berea Police Chief Mark Schulz said. No one was
hurt. There may have been other targets, the chief said… Hausmann was
arrested Tuesday on information developed from tips and charged with
felony assault and carrying with concealed weapons, Schulz said. He
had a revolver and ammunition "consistent with the caliber rounds
recovered at the shootings," Schulz said… Hausmann was arrested
Tuesday when he unexpectedly returned home while police had his home
under surveillance. He was wearing shooting earmuffs at the time, the
police chief said.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/nation/authorities-say-65-year-old-man-charged-with-shooting-at-vehicles-in-cleveland-area-81701012.html
---

Tangentially Related: … I learned something during my several combat
tours in the Persian Gulf region. The greeting in that part of the
world is a variation on "salaam" or "shalom." We tend to translate
this denotatively as "peace," suggesting merely an absence of war. But
that misses the beautiful connotation that this word has to the people
in the cradle of civilization. To them, "salaam" or "shalom" means
that everything is good and in its place. It implies a general feeling
of contentedness and peacefulness. This sense of a peaceful, contented
spirit is captured somewhat by our old holiday greeting of "peace on
Earth, goodwill toward men" — a wish to look at the positive and to
convey some extra regard and kindness to others… (Many instructors who
train people for lawful carry of firearms use the concept of the "cone
of peace" – essentially, if you find yourself in a quarrelsome mood,
it may not be a good idea to be carrying a deadly weapon. I suspect
that the condition that Col. Staats decries is more common in
jurisdictions like DC, which may not be polite societies because they
are not, as far as decent people are concerned, armed societies. Let
us not forget that the latter concepts should go together.)

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/local-opinions/2010/01/a_message_to_rude_dc_give_sala.html?hpid=voicesopinion
---

Followers

Blog Archive